| UK | Germany |
| Home - Video - Formats - Boxed Sets - Action & Adventure | Help | |
| 1-20 of 163 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next 20 |
click price to see details click image to enlarge click link to go to the store
| 1. The James Bond Collection | |
![]() | list price: $89.99
(price subject to change: see help) Asin: B00000K2SO Catlog: Video Average Customer Review: US | Canada | United Kingdom | Germany | France | Japan |
|
Amazon.com Reviews (128)
THUNDERBALL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! LIVE AND LET DIE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! FOR YOUR EYES ONLY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! LICENCE TO KILL????????????????????????? GOLDENEYE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! TOMORROW NEVER DIES!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! WITH THE EXCEPTION OF LICENCE TO KILL, YOU ARE IN FOR A REAL TREAT IF YOU BUY THIS SET OF 6 OF THE GREATEST BOND FILMS OF ALL TIME. GOLDFINGER: ARGUABLY THE BEST BOND FILM ALONG WITH THE SPY WHO LOVED ME AND FROM RUSSIA WITH LOVE, BOND INVESTIGATES AURIC GOLDFINGER WHO TRIES TO TAKE OVER FORT KNOX. THUNDERBALL: AN EPIC BOND FLICK HAS BOND TRYING TO RECOVER STOLEN ATOMIC BOMBS IN THE BAHAMAS. LIVE AND LET DIE: ROGER MOORE MAKES HIS DEBUT AS BOND IN THIS STRANGE DEBUT ABOUT VOODOO AND CROCODILES. (DON'T ASK) FOR YOUR EYES ONLY: GREAT PLOT AND BOND GIRL AS BOND TRIES TO RECOVER A STOLED ATAC MACHINE AND PREVENT THE RUSSIANS FROM GETTING IT. LICENCE TO KILL: HORRIBLE MOVIE, ONLY WATCH IT ONCE. GOLDENEYE: PIERCE BROSNAN MAKES HIS DEBUT AS BOND IN THIS THRILLING MOVIE, THE FIRST OF THE 90'S, BOND INVESTIGATES THE THEFT OF 2 HELICOPTERS CARRYING WARHEADS. LISCENCE TO KILL: BOND AT HIS BEST WITH HIS DEFINITE EQUAL, MICHELLE YEOW AS THEY THWART A NEWSPAPER TYCOOD WHO WANTS TO TAKE OVER THE WORLD. THAT'S ALL FOLKS, BUY THIS COLLECTION!!!!!!!!!!
| |
| 2. The James Bond Collection Volume 2 | |
![]() | list price: $41.96
(price subject to change: see help) Asin: B00004RG68 Catlog: Video Sales Rank: 4498 Average Customer Review: US | Canada | United Kingdom | Germany | France | Japan |
Reviews (49)
For action, Dr. No and Her Majesty's Secret Service are two of the best of the series. The Spy Who Loved Me and The Man with the Golden Gun offer two of the most stylish of the series, with lavish sets and larger than life villians. This set would have received five stars had it not included "Moonraker," one of the two weak Moore movies (the other being "A View to A Kill") and the Bond producers response to "Star Wars;" however, since "For Your Eyes Only" had been issued on the previous set, that was not possible. At Amazon's price, this set is a must for Bond, and other action, lovers, and I'd recommend it.
| |
| 3. North and South: Book 2 | |
![]() | list price: $99.98
our price: $99.98 (price subject to change: see help) Asin: 6303536859 Catlog: Video Sales Rank: 2193 Average Customer Review: US | Canada | United Kingdom | Germany | France | Japan |
Reviews (28)
My next question is When are they going to make a movie from the 3rd book. Heaven and Hell?
I think it is a wonderful story to be enjoyed by all, keep in mind there are some passionate scenes, of course by today's standards that may be a stretch. ... Read more | |
| 4. James Bond 007 Collection Volume 3 | |
![]() | list price: $49.96
(price subject to change: see help) Asin: B00004W9C7 Catlog: Video Sales Rank: 14708 Average Customer Review: US | Canada | United Kingdom | Germany | France | Japan |
Reviews (43)
| |
| 5. Indiana Jones Gift Set | |
![]() | list price: $22.95
our price: $20.66 (price subject to change: see help) Asin: 0792158261 Catlog: Video Sales Rank: 208 Average Customer Review: US | Canada | United Kingdom | Germany | France | Japan |
|
Amazon.com Reviews (402)
Raiders : (10/10). A true movie classic. Harrison Ford added another iconic role to his pedestal along with Han Solo. Every scene in the film, from the classic opening prologue to the opening of the Ark is thrilling. Jones is sent by the US government to stop the Nazi's from recovering the Ark of the Covenant. Karen Allen, as Marion Ravenwood remains THE Indy heroine and Paul Freeman is great as the slimy Belloq. John Rhys-Davies and Denholm Elliot are great support as Sallah and Marcus Brody. They even return for the third movie. Not much more to say here that hasn't been said before. Temple of Doom: (8 1/2 /10). Not up to Raiders, but still a great, underrated movie. Come on people, this was a great movie!I've always found the constant bashing and dislike for this film to be ridiculous. Some of Indiana Jones's best moments are in this film, such as the minecar chase, voodoo doll fight, spiked room and the final scene on the bridge. True, Kate Capshaw's character, Willie Scott is irritating but the movie has a lot of strengths to make up for her constant screaming. Short Round is amusing and Molaram is a great villain. For all you haters of the movie; buy the used dvds of Raiders and Crusade somewhere such as E-Bay or a video store. It's not like Temple was THAT bad. Grow up and get a life people,you sound like a bunch of whiny 5-year old kids. Last Crusade: (9/10). The opening scene with the late River Phoenix as the young Indy is an exciting opening scene. It's nice to learn about Indy's origins this time around as well. Sean Connery's addition to the series was a great idea. The father-son relationship between Ford and Connery is memorable and adds humor and drama to the movie. In fact, Connery's presence is what keeps Crusade from being a sort of-retread of Raiders. This movie is a little too similar to Raiders such as involving Indy racing the Nazi's to find an artifact,Indy meeting up with somebody he has been estranged with, both take place in deserts, similar ending, etc. Also, the Nazi villains this time, while adequate, aren't memorable. They feel like recycled versions of the Nazi's in Raiders. Still, Crusade was a great third installment to a wonderful trilogy. Bonus Disc: The interviews and makings of- were fun to watch but there should have been more on this disc. Such as deleted scenes. The Godfather and Back to the Future dvd sets had plethoras of bonus material. The lack of bonus material on the set might leave one unsatisfied. I hope Lucas will bring out the other great trilogy of his on dvd soon. Hopefully, Indiana Jones 4 will be awesome.
I will, however, make a comment on my impressions upon watching these films again after having purchased the DVD set. The prints are crisp and clean, the sound is clear, and overall the films look and sound fantastic. As for the content - Raiders and Last Crusade are still highly enjoyable. Compared to more recent action series (e.g. the Batman films, the Terminator films), you'll find the Indy movies are more exciting and more fun. Unfortunately, Temple of Doom, which was not well-received even when it was first released, did not age well. The overall feel is ponderous, Kate Capshaw is given little to do but scream, and the action set-pieces border on the rediculous. Unfortunately, we've waited years for these films to come out in this format, and we expected loads of extras - if not on the Lord of the Rings level, at least on the Star Wars (Episodes I and II) level. This set does not deliver - there are no cut scenes, no footage of premiers or awards ceremonies, no original promotional materials (other than theatrical trailers), etc. There are a few documentaries, which are mostly "making of" features filmed on and around the sets of the films, with some modern interviews/reflections from Lucas, Ford, Speilberg, Ben Burtt, John Williams, and many more. These docs are fantastic - well-written, interesting, and at several hours, very satisfying. But still, having waited 10 years for DVD versions of these films, I would have been willing to wait a few more years to get more of the extras I want. I hope the Star Wars set due out in the fall is more complete! ... Read more | |
| 6. The Lord of the Rings - The Fellowship of the Ring (Special Extended Edition) Director: Peter Jackson | |
![]() | list price: $24.99
our price: $24.99 (price subject to change: see help) Asin: B000069K5I Catlog: Video Sales Rank: 1438 Average Customer Review: US | Canada | United Kingdom | Germany | France | Japan |
|
Amazon.com essential video Reviews (3438)
"The Lord of the Rings: the Fellowship of the Ring" is certainly one of the best DVDs of the year. The splendid fantasy adventure is presented in standard full screen format. The DVD has marvelously flawless picture quality and a great 5.1-EX Dolby Digital sound. If special features are a must then this DVD is a welcome addition to any collection. Its supplemental material includes numerous behind-the-scenes featurettes, trailers including a preview of the upcoming "The Two Towers", a music video, DVD-ROM extras and impressive interactive menus. Overall, "The Fellowship of the Ring" scores an "A".
However, as much as I was stunned by this film, the screenplay and adaptions were absolute rubbish! In my opinion, Mrs. Jackson and anyone who worked with her should be fed to the Balrog, along with Peter Jackson himself for allowing it. Their were changes in characters and character, aspirations, and events. Tolkien's dialogue was rarely followed. Some reviewers say this doesn't deter from the story. It does deter from the story! That's exactly what it does. How difficult is it to follow a story and dialogue that has already been written? Editing is one thing and is understandable when approaching a big screen adaptation with time constraints, but arrant changes to a story are not. This I find unforgivable. In addition, no Fatty Bolger playing up appearances in Frodo's new house in Buckland; no Willow The Wisp; no Tom Bombadil; no Barrow-wights; no Rhadaghast The Brown, and very little attention payed to the Hobbits' stealth from and cat and mouse games with the Black Riders in The Shire. In addition, very little of Tolkien's dialogue was covered. The Fellowship Of The Ring is mainly dialogue, and takes place mainly in The Shire. What happened to Peter Jackson's boasting about how closely he was going to follow Tolkien's story? With all its faults, Ralph Bakshi's film follows Tolkien's story and dialogue more closely than Jackson's version does! Jackson is either pandering to his own ego (or his wife's), or just trying to make the film(s) appeal to more people than just Tolkien fans; and the only reason for the latter would be money. Aside from the above criticism, I was very annoyed by WETA's cheesy computer-generated Cave Troll and Balrog. This garbage belongs in a video game, not an important epic film. What ever happened to employing the talents of real artists like Ray Harryhausen or Jim Henson's Creature Shop? Is it just me, or are today's film makers relying too heavily on computer-generated effects, and using the words "can't be done" or "not within the budget" as a scape-goat to seeking alternative ways of creating effects, like the filmmakers of old had to do? However all scrutinising aside, The Fellowship Of The Ring is an overwhelming cinematic experience, and one which should not be missed by anyone; with the exception of pre-teens, to whom this film will only terrorise. This is a tremendous Christmas present, and I thank Peter Jackson and everyone involved in its creation for it. It's difficult to believe that there are two more films of this calibre to follow. I look forward to their release, as well as a few more viewings of The Fellowship Of The Ring. In closing I'd just like to say that Tolkien fans have still not been given a definitive screen version of The Lord Of The Rings. In fact, the only way I believe it would be possible to remain faithful to Tolkien's story and (even edited) dialogue, would be to make a complete mini-series for non-commercial television; basically, a visual accompaniment to the long BBC Radio production. Perhaps one day someone with enough integrity and who cares enough will.
It made me want to read the books to see what the films couldn't touch upon ...the poetry and descriptions of middle earth are very much on target. I really hope that Jackson gets the chance to do the Hobbit. It would be a crime if it wasn't adapted by him in the very near future. All I have to say to the film makers is ..Lets see the Hobbit before the actors become unavailable to produce the film! ... Read more | |
| 7. The Lost World Director: Stuart Orme | |
![]() | list price: $24.95
our price: $24.95 (price subject to change: see help) Asin: B00006JE0A Catlog: Video Sales Rank: 2842 Average Customer Review: US | Canada | United Kingdom | Germany | France | Japan |
|
Description Reviews (11)
This version of The Lost World reminds me of the 1960 version, obviously due to it being based on the same book, and I knew some major points of the story and seeing them redone with a contemporary style was very rewarding. I love this movie.
The changes from the novel include the following: 1) Professor Challenger-in the book, he is not at all a likeable character, and is not meant to be, but in the film, they made him more amenable, yet still kept much of his stubborness and self-righteousness. It was a good compromise for the purpose of viewer accetability of a main character. 2) Agnes Clooney-the female member of the team in the film was not in the novel, but is still a welcomed addition. She is a more liberated woman in some ways, but it isn't done over the top so she is beating up savages and shooting up things (she isn't Sheena, Queen of the Jungle, and that type of character wouldn't have fit in this story). Rather, Agnes as a character does fit a woman living in her circumstances in that time. 4) The Demented Reverend-He wasn't in the book either, but I actually think he wasn't a very good addition. I'm kind of sick and tired of this cliched evil missionary character who kills in the name of the lord. Its been done to death. Thought, admittedly, Peter Faulk played this character very well, and did instill in him more soul and complexity than most of these evil missionary stereotypical characters get in most films. One thing I really liked about this film was how it was an action/adventure story, but it also made you think about what was going on in the story. It had some really good things to say about man's interaction with nature, and preservation of the environment against exploitation. Challenger, towards the end of the film, makes a comment about science often not being accessible to the public at large without it being dressed up a bit as entertainment. This is exactly what this film does in some ways. It presents and entertaining, engrossing adventure, but also presents interesting scientific thoughts about ecology. Just what can happen when man starts mucking about and disturbing the balance of nature? And the answer to that question wasn't entirely clear in one circumstance. The dispute between Challenger's point of view versus Lord Roxton's view on what to do with the Ape Men in the film. They were both right and both wrong from my view. This really points to the difficult balance between how much we should interfere in nature and how much we should just leave things alone. I recommend this film very highly to anyone who loves the original novel, or action/adventure stories in general. This film continues A&E's record of excellence in creating film adaptations of classic stories.
THE STORY is 'basically' the same. Well, at first I was worried looking at the cover -- six people apparently looking at the dinosaurs. Six? Yes, the film, based on Conan Doyle's 1912 novel, added TWO extra characters to the original expedition team (misunderstood genius Prof. Challenger, natural-born cynic Prof. Summerlee, newsreporter Edward Malone, adventure-loving hunter Lord Roxton), which are about to reveal the secret of the plateau in the Amazon, and to prove that dinosaurs are still living there. THE NEW CHARACTERS are one zealous priest and his niece, played by Peter Falk and Elaine Cassidy respectively. They join in Professor Challenger (Bob Hoskins) and his team in the jungle, only to complicate the situation -- deadly dinosaurs, the more dangerous apemen (or the Missing Link) and the "Indians" (so they say). The addition, in fact, works for the better, getting rid of the annoying elements in the original book, like the patronizing way Doyle treated the natives in the book. And other changes done to the story are justified, but some might find the different tone in the ending (or the modernized answer to Challenger's expedition) slightly anti-climax, compared with the slient version, or Spielberg's "Lost World." SPECIAL EFFECTS are first-rate, with the convincing images of dinosaurs walking in the jungle. The fierce fight between the humans and the allosaurs is the highlight of the film though some kids find it too horrible. (And parents should be warned that there is a suggested scene of cannibalism). The location is fantastic, showing some of the scenes (like the entrance to the plateau) almost exactly as the book tells us. In spite of its length (more than 2hrs 30 mins), "The Lost World" keeps on rolling as smooth as "The Jurassic Park," and it makes you think a little about the way we meddle with the nature. It aspires to be more than just a dinosaur movie, and it succeeds well.
Pros: Good look to the story; great effects. Good cast.
| |
| 8. Sharpe's Collection Set 4 | |
![]() | list price: $49.98
our price: $49.98 (price subject to change: see help) Asin: 0773386432 Catlog: Video Sales Rank: 13883 Average Customer Review: US | Canada | United Kingdom | Germany | France | Japan |
Reviews (5)
SHARPE'S REVENGE closes out General Calvet, and his trusted servent Gaston, General Ross, Captian Frederickson (one of the best supporting characters in the series) and of course Major Ducos who is the classic foe for Sharpe. It is a story well acted and visually satisfying. In terms of story it is the best of the three. The transformation of Sharpe's wife begins here and is superior to the book as it builds on the previous movie which was an origional story. Since she avoids tempation only by the aid of Harris (who's absence along with Hagman is painful)her failure becomes credible. SHARPE'S JUSTICE gives us a peacetime Sharpe and Harper trying to adapt to a peacetime life. The loss of Harris is made up to some degree by the return of Caroline Langrishe as Lady Anne ( much more interesting than his French lady )and the addition of Philip Glenister as Truman. I have now seen Glenister in two period pieces of that time (the 2nd being as Hobbs in the latest Hornblower movies)and he seems born to it. The plot is interesting and different as Sharpe finds himself in a situation and an enviorment that he is unable to cope with. It isn't done as well as it could be, but I think this is due to the script and plot more than the acting. The scenes concerning Sharpe's wife are totally contrived. They are the only reason this set fails to get five stars. As the picture come sans the war the action level is also down, but we expect this so it hurts very little. Worth a watch, just fast forward over Sharpe's wife (unless she is with Lady Anne) after the first viewing. SHARPE'S WATERLOO is a spectacle and a tough one. It is the most fameous battle in European history and the battle scenes almost steal the entire show. In terms of character development it is grand. Jane finally becomes the full fledged villian of the piece and she and her lover are played to perfection. The Prince of Orange fails the villany test as his errors are mostly of stupidity until the very end. Harper is actually more interesting than Sharpe in this one, and the return of the team of Harris & Hagman is great ("Prusians ahh"). It is the only one of the Sharpe movies where the battle drives the characters and not vice versa. This is due to Waterloo's place in British history. Waterloo is the star and all of the characters are caught in its pull driven toward Europe's and their own climax. Quite a finish.
| |
| 9. Bruce Lee - Master Collection | |
![]() | list price: $29.98
our price: $29.98 (price subject to change: see help) Asin: 6305508534 Catlog: Video Sales Rank: 26616 Average Customer Review: US | Canada | United Kingdom | Germany | France | Japan |
Reviews (50)
Considering it lacks Enter the Dragon which was probably Bruce Lee's best movie. And that none of the movies have extra features or the original chinese audio tracks, I stil give this box set a 4! I think it is an excellent buy!
| |
| 10. Indiana Jones Trilogy | |
![]() | list price: $44.95
(price subject to change: see help) Asin: 6301574117 Catlog: Video Sales Rank: 9305 Average Customer Review: US | Canada | United Kingdom | Germany | France | Japan |
Reviews (126)
Though Temple of Doom lacks Sallah, Marcus Brody, and the Nazis, it is an improvement over Raiders in more than a few ways. To start, Ford is even better as Indy for his character is tested more. Douglas Slocombe's photography is more effective, and John Williams' music score is even more diverse and genius. Temple of Doom is also more creative, emotionally effective, and imaginative. However, it lacks the spectacle of the first film and is far more controversial and violent.This is the movie that created the PG-13 rating. Dennis Muren's stunning Oscar-winning visual effects match Richard Edlund's effects in Raiders, yet they are not as awe-inspiring or important to the story. Elliot Scott's production design is terrific, and the cult sequences are very intense. The stunts top the ones in Raiders and are really good. The most memorable sequences have to be the mine car chase, the creature feature dinner, the Shanghai nightclub opening, the duel at the cult platform, and the rope bridge finale, incredible. Though Temple of Doom isn't as good as Raiders or Last Crusade it is highly recommended and is one of the best adventure films ever made.
Harrison Ford is brilliant in the role that he was born to play. Although the character of Indy is shrouded in macho trappings, this IS set in the thirties. So, I don't find the supposed "sexism" to be all that off-putting. Ford's considerable acting skills are greatly tested by Temple. There's a scene where Indy is being tortured by members of the evil Thuggee cult, and the viewer is absolutely disturbed by the scene. A lesser actor would have made this an exercise of pure camp. Kate Capshaw is, quite frankly, a little annoying as Willie Scott. I don't think it's necessarily Capshaw's fault; her character could have been played by Audrey Hepburn and still would have been irritating. Willie, as remarked by some reviewers, screams her head off during most of the movie. Eventually, you kind of hope the bugs or the lava will finish her off. Still, some scenes with the character work. The opening sequence and Willie's behavior at the palace are charming. Ke Huy Quan is pretty good as Short Round, Indy's temporary sidekick. Again, it's the character that is a bit distracting, not the actor. Ke Huy Quan is delightful in the poker scene with Indy in the jungle and is much more of a help than Willie could ever be, but some of the scenes of Short Round kicking the poop out of the cult members are a little laughable. Amrish Puri is wonderful as the awfully evil Mola Ram. This guy makes Belloq look like Maurice Chevalier with such an intensely evil leer and rather septic heart operation procedures. Roshan Seth is also brilliant as the devious prime minister. Both of these fine actors are also in the wonderful movie "Gandhi." Philip Stone's character is something of a Col. Blimp, yet a very well acted Col. Blimp. I'm sure he probably listens to Elgar while sipping his tea in his bath. The rest of the supporting cast are also excellent: Lao Che and the Indian holy men are very enjoyable, if a bit one-dimensional. The accusations of the film being racist are, in my opinion, a little silly. Yes, Hinduism is much more tolerant of a religion than Christianity could ever hope to be. As far as I know, there wasn't ever a Kali cult that performed human sacrifices, and it can be easily and convincingly argued that British rule in India was mostly malign. However, stating that all of the Indians in the film are portrayed as weak or devious is like stating that all the Germans in the other two films are portayed as cruel and militaristic. I can understand a person's sensitivity to such things, but since it's an Indy movie, naturally Indy is going to be portrayed as the wonderful savior while everyone else is reduced to being either dependent on him or actively trying to dispatch him. In my opinion, problems do arise when people (typically Americans) see movies like this and take them as real history. For instance, many Americans who have seen Braveheart now consider themselves experts on Scottish history. Occasionally, when I eat Indian food (which is delicious), I hear some bozo talking about eating monkey's brains, as was also stated by another reviewer. I can understand a person of Indian heritage being very irritated by such behavior, but I don't think it's entirely fair to blame the filmmakers for the behavior of some of the more stupid people who watch their movies. Hopefully, in the next Indiana Jones film, Indy will take on the scariest religious cult yet: America's religious Right. I can think of a certain self-righteous someone who could use a few good punches.
| |
| 11. Hercules The Legendary Journeys - The Xena Trilogy (Xena, the Warrior Princess / Unchained Heart / The Gauntlet) | |
![]() | list price: $24.99
our price: $24.99 (price subject to change: see help) Asin: 6304795262 Catlog: Video Sales Rank: 14314 Average Customer Review: US | Canada | United Kingdom | Germany | France | Japan |
Reviews (7)
P.S. There is a lot of interesting insight in the offical book that goes with this triology. P.P.S. Herc deserves to fall in love again so I don't think it is corny.
| |
| 12. Wild America | |
![]() | list price: $39.99
our price: $39.99 (price subject to change: see help) Asin: 6305307482 Catlog: Video Average Customer Review: US | Canada | United Kingdom | Germany | France | Japan |
Reviews (1)
| |
| 13. Walking Tall Trilogy Boxed Set | |
![]() | list price: $29.85
our price: $29.85 (price subject to change: see help) Asin: 630571312X Catlog: Video Sales Rank: 1952 Average Customer Review: US | Canada | United Kingdom | Germany | France | Japan |
Reviews (18)
| |