Amazon.com

This direct-to-video sequel in the Addams Family series stars a winning pair of actors as the everlasting lovers Morticia and Gomez Addams: Daryl Hannah and Tim Curry. Most of the rest of the cast is new, as well. The story concerns the distinct possibility that Grandma and Grandpa Addams are turning normal, so the entire family goes to an Addams reunion in hopes of finding a witch doctor who can help. The film is entertaining largely because of the instant-recognition factor of Addams shtick. Curry and Hannah are good, but the whole production has an obvious, scaled-back feeling about it, probably to accommodate the limits of video and a small budget. --Tom Keogh ... Read more

Reviews (16)

Good for a laugh
Oh, come on! Most of you people are being way too harsh. Okay, it's a terrible follow up to the excellent first two films. Okay, it's a terrible film, period. But Reunion is an obvious attempt at a return to the style of the original television series (although this is probably due to a low production budget than a deliberate effort) that was not entirely successful in the outcome. But still, not that many people saw the third instalment, so it's always good to whip it out during "what is the worst sequel ever" conversations. This is B-grade at its finest, people. And poor Daryl Hannah - everything that woman touches turns to dust. Just forget you ever saw the first film and the second film, and bring on the overly-buttered popcorn. Three stars for pure camp enjoyment.

Another Addams Adventure
It's not very, very, good.
The mistake they made was, Morticia's parents are the only ones alive. Gomez's parents are Dead. It's not a very good plot.
Tim Kully is a good Gomez, but he dosen't really Look like Gomez. Dayrl Hannah is an okay Morticia, and the Wendsday and Pugsly are bad.
Pugsly, like in the first two is fat, but not tooooooooo overweight, like this one. Wednsday, does not look like Christina Ricci as Wedsnday.
I think that they could have made a better movie.

DUMB WERID MOVIE
THIS MOVIE WAS JUST DUMB NOTHING LIKE THE FIRST TWO THIS HAD NO HUMUR IS WAS JUST DUMUB IT WAS BORING THE PLOT DID NOT MAKE SENSE ATT ALL WENDAY AND PUGLEY WAT THEY DID IN THIS MADE NO SENSE THE ADDAMS FAMILY ACCTED SUPID IN THIS ONE FESTER WENT AROUND ACCTEING LIKE HAD TO THE BATEROOM A ALOT IN THIS TIM CURY DID NOT PLAY THE PART FOR GOMEZ GOOD AT ALL WHY DID THEY HAVE TO PUT A KILLER DOG THAT WAS NOT EVEN FUUNY THEY DREESED TO GLOTHIC LOOKING IN THIS THIS IS JUST NOT A GOOD MOVIE DONT SEE IT I HOPE WHEN THEY MAKE A NOTHER ADDAMS FAMILY MOVIE THEY MAKE IT GOOD LIKE THEY FIRST TWO AND PUT EFERT IN TO IT AND THEY PUT ANJELICA HUSTON IN IT.

BAD STUPID FILM THAT DID NOT PAY NO THIG TO THE FIRST TOO
I THAT THIS FILM WAS WAS GO TO BE GOOD BUT IT WAS VERY BAD THE FLIM I NOT ANTHIG LIKE THE FIRST TWO THAT WERE GOOD MOVIES that were a lotlike th 60 tv seris addams family reunin was just a ripe of flim plot did not make any sense to me horblie film the way they made addams family in this one they made them at like were stupid family when they relly wernt what wenday and pugley did made sense the granny accted werid in this one and feter not played by critfer loynd in this flim accted like he was inpain all the time dont see it it is very very very bad flim just buy or see the first two there worth every peny.

Not as horrible as people think...
Well, the actors and actresses were different from the first two movies, but that was to be expected, considering how one was dead, and two were too old to look the part, but all in all, not a bad film at all.

I have been watching Addams-related media for quite some time, and although this film isn't much better than the others, it is certainly a far cry from being much WORSE as well.

The toughest part of this film was getting used to the new faces. After that, the second toughest part was getting used to the poor graphics given to the killer dog, but those are just inconsistensies and budget issues that could hardly be avoided...

Thing was still a blast, Wednesday was still a lovable deadpan, Pugley was still a delinquent, etc, etc... I found almost nothing wrong with the film except for what I mentioned above.

Now a lot of people say the plot was common. This is only partially true. I agree that I wouldn't be surprised to see a plot like this showcased in the classic '60s series, but there would not have been as much adventure if it had been in that series. Not only that, there is so little FAITHFUL Addams material coming out nowadays, we should feel blessed as long as they don't become the brady bunch. (I have been rather Addams-starved for a while.) I don't think I can explain it better than that.

So all in all, a nice little film that doesn't tread on our memories and stays faithful to our well-established characters. A continuation of what's already been started, and really, isn't that what every sequal ought to be? ... Read more

Reviews (1)

Beauty is only skin deep...
Disgusting little film about 2 aliens who skin human beings in order to walk among us unseen. The movie beautifully introduces the characters and the ol' boring town 'Tranquility' where all those strange killings take place. The 2 characters Anita Clark (Joanna Pacula) & her husband Sam (Peter Onorati) suspect what's underneath the newcomers' skin could be deadly!
Below average: Produced by schlock meister Roger Corman. ... Read more

Reviews (1)

Low budget but entertaining
I must admit that I purchased this from Amazon because of the enticing cover and the promise of seeing Maria Ford do something more than bad acting. Unfortunately, I was disappointed as her character is very flat and teasing without really getting there.

The movie itself was decently written and has a semi-original storyline. Special effect are, as was to be expected, on the low-end of technology but there is quite a lot of running and quite a lot of blood. For a sci-fi horror fan, this movie rates just high enough to be in the collection. ... Read more

Reviews (2)

ALIEN VIGILANTE JUSTICE...
This film, the sequel to "Welcome to Planet Earth" (aka Alien Avengers), is funny, but not as funny as the original. While it retains most of the original cast, with the exception of the role of Rhonda, which is now played by Julie Brown, the screenplay is a little too ham handed to make for a complete success. Still, it makes for some laughs.

Here, Rhonda (Julie Brown) and her husband, Charlie (George Wendt), finally get out of prison for having imposed their vigilante style justice on a number of undesirables. Oblivious to the error of their ways, they go on their merry way and end up in the town of Justice, Arizona, where livestock is being killed in a ritualistic manner. The local yokels are blaming it on aliens, rumors that are being fueled by real estate developers in hopes of buying dirt cheap the properties of those yokels who panic.

Charlie and Rhonda aren't the least bit disturbed by the rumors. After all, they are aliens themselves. Meanwhile, their daughter, Daphne (Anastasia Sakelaris), unbeknownst to them, is returning to Earth with her Earthling husband, Joseph (Christopher M. Brown), in order to bring her parents home to their planet. In between the parties connecting with the each other, mayhem rules in Justice, and before you know it, Rhonda and Charlie find themselves deputized as sheriffs, in hope of bringing law and order to the town. There is nothing that these alien vigilantes would like more.

Playing by their own rules, which are formulated upon their own skewed perceptions, Charlie and Rhonda rout out the evil doers. In the meantime, Daphne and Joseph have their own little adventures. This does make for some very funny scenes, but they are few and far between. Still, those viewers who enjoyed the prequel will, undoubtedly, enjoy this sequel.

The implications are stunning!
WOW! The first word that comes to mind after viewing this video. If what is said in this video is true, the world is in for a big shocker! A must see! Jason A. Overholser TOTALUFO ... Read more

Reviews (16)

Good for a laugh
Oh, come on! Most of you people are being way too harsh. Okay, it's a terrible follow up to the excellent first two films. Okay, it's a terrible film, period. But Reunion is an obvious attempt at a return to the style of the original television series (although this is probably due to a low production budget than a deliberate effort) that was not entirely successful in the outcome. But still, not that many people saw the third instalment, so it's always good to whip it out during "what is the worst sequel ever" conversations. This is B-grade at its finest, people. And poor Daryl Hannah - everything that woman touches turns to dust. Just forget you ever saw the first film and the second film, and bring on the overly-buttered popcorn. Three stars for pure camp enjoyment.

Another Addams Adventure
It's not very, very, good.
The mistake they made was, Morticia's parents are the only ones alive. Gomez's parents are Dead. It's not a very good plot.
Tim Kully is a good Gomez, but he dosen't really Look like Gomez. Dayrl Hannah is an okay Morticia, and the Wendsday and Pugsly are bad.
Pugsly, like in the first two is fat, but not tooooooooo overweight, like this one. Wednsday, does not look like Christina Ricci as Wedsnday.
I think that they could have made a better movie.

DUMB WERID MOVIE
THIS MOVIE WAS JUST DUMB NOTHING LIKE THE FIRST TWO THIS HAD NO HUMUR IS WAS JUST DUMUB IT WAS BORING THE PLOT DID NOT MAKE SENSE ATT ALL WENDAY AND PUGLEY WAT THEY DID IN THIS MADE NO SENSE THE ADDAMS FAMILY ACCTED SUPID IN THIS ONE FESTER WENT AROUND ACCTEING LIKE HAD TO THE BATEROOM A ALOT IN THIS TIM CURY DID NOT PLAY THE PART FOR GOMEZ GOOD AT ALL WHY DID THEY HAVE TO PUT A KILLER DOG THAT WAS NOT EVEN FUUNY THEY DREESED TO GLOTHIC LOOKING IN THIS THIS IS JUST NOT A GOOD MOVIE DONT SEE IT I HOPE WHEN THEY MAKE A NOTHER ADDAMS FAMILY MOVIE THEY MAKE IT GOOD LIKE THEY FIRST TWO AND PUT EFERT IN TO IT AND THEY PUT ANJELICA HUSTON IN IT.

BAD STUPID FILM THAT DID NOT PAY NO THIG TO THE FIRST TOO
I THAT THIS FILM WAS WAS GO TO BE GOOD BUT IT WAS VERY BAD THE FLIM I NOT ANTHIG LIKE THE FIRST TWO THAT WERE GOOD MOVIES that were a lotlike th 60 tv seris addams family reunin was just a ripe of flim plot did not make any sense to me horblie film the way they made addams family in this one they made them at like were stupid family when they relly wernt what wenday and pugley did made sense the granny accted werid in this one and feter not played by critfer loynd in this flim accted like he was inpain all the time dont see it it is very very very bad flim just buy or see the first two there worth every peny.

Not as horrible as people think...
Well, the actors and actresses were different from the first two movies, but that was to be expected, considering how one was dead, and two were too old to look the part, but all in all, not a bad film at all.

I have been watching Addams-related media for quite some time, and although this film isn't much better than the others, it is certainly a far cry from being much WORSE as well.

The toughest part of this film was getting used to the new faces. After that, the second toughest part was getting used to the poor graphics given to the killer dog, but those are just inconsistensies and budget issues that could hardly be avoided...

Thing was still a blast, Wednesday was still a lovable deadpan, Pugley was still a delinquent, etc, etc... I found almost nothing wrong with the film except for what I mentioned above.

Now a lot of people say the plot was common. This is only partially true. I agree that I wouldn't be surprised to see a plot like this showcased in the classic '60s series, but there would not have been as much adventure if it had been in that series. Not only that, there is so little FAITHFUL Addams material coming out nowadays, we should feel blessed as long as they don't become the brady bunch. (I have been rather Addams-starved for a while.) I don't think I can explain it better than that.

So all in all, a nice little film that doesn't tread on our memories and stays faithful to our well-established characters. A continuation of what's already been started, and really, isn't that what every sequal ought to be? ... Read more

Reviews (2)

EXCELLENT STRIPPER FILM
MARIA FORD DOES A BANG UP JOB PLAYING A STRIPPER INVOLVED IN MURDER IN THIS FILM. SHE ALSO CHOREOGRAPHED THE DANCES WHICH ARE MUCH BETTER DONE THAT THOSE IN DEMI M OOR'E "SHOWGIRLS."

i want to get some information on VHS
i just want to know why a lot of people to come this page, and i want to improve my knowledge on this program ... Read more

Reviews (1)

You have the wrong title of this movie! It's Under Oath!
For starters you have the wrong title listed for this movie! it's called "under oath" not "urban justice"!

This movie is about two cops who have to track down a killer. There are few twists and turns along the way. The DVD is very bare bones!! It has a few trailers of other movies besides this movie! This DVD also has a very bare bone actor bio on it!! Also it's not closed captioned like most DVD's are!!

Jack Scalia does his best in this B grade cop movie!! Rent it first before you buy it!! ... Read more

Reviews (1)

You have the wrong title of this movie! It's Under Oath!
For starters you have the wrong title listed for this movie! it's called "under oath" not "urban justice"!

This movie is about two cops who have to track down a killer. There are few twists and turns along the way. The DVD is very bare bones!! It has a few trailers of other movies besides this movie! This DVD also has a very bare bone actor bio on it!! Also it's not closed captioned like most DVD's are!!

Jack Scalia does his best in this B grade cop movie!! Rent it first before you buy it!! ... Read more

Reviews (16)

Good for a laugh
Oh, come on! Most of you people are being way too harsh. Okay, it's a terrible follow up to the excellent first two films. Okay, it's a terrible film, period. But Reunion is an obvious attempt at a return to the style of the original television series (although this is probably due to a low production budget than a deliberate effort) that was not entirely successful in the outcome. But still, not that many people saw the third instalment, so it's always good to whip it out during "what is the worst sequel ever" conversations. This is B-grade at its finest, people. And poor Daryl Hannah - everything that woman touches turns to dust. Just forget you ever saw the first film and the second film, and bring on the overly-buttered popcorn. Three stars for pure camp enjoyment.

Another Addams Adventure
It's not very, very, good.
The mistake they made was, Morticia's parents are the only ones alive. Gomez's parents are Dead. It's not a very good plot.
Tim Kully is a good Gomez, but he dosen't really Look like Gomez. Dayrl Hannah is an okay Morticia, and the Wendsday and Pugsly are bad.
Pugsly, like in the first two is fat, but not tooooooooo overweight, like this one. Wednsday, does not look like Christina Ricci as Wedsnday.
I think that they could have made a better movie.

DUMB WERID MOVIE
THIS MOVIE WAS JUST DUMB NOTHING LIKE THE FIRST TWO THIS HAD NO HUMUR IS WAS JUST DUMUB IT WAS BORING THE PLOT DID NOT MAKE SENSE ATT ALL WENDAY AND PUGLEY WAT THEY DID IN THIS MADE NO SENSE THE ADDAMS FAMILY ACCTED SUPID IN THIS ONE FESTER WENT AROUND ACCTEING LIKE HAD TO THE BATEROOM A ALOT IN THIS TIM CURY DID NOT PLAY THE PART FOR GOMEZ GOOD AT ALL WHY DID THEY HAVE TO PUT A KILLER DOG THAT WAS NOT EVEN FUUNY THEY DREESED TO GLOTHIC LOOKING IN THIS THIS IS JUST NOT A GOOD MOVIE DONT SEE IT I HOPE WHEN THEY MAKE A NOTHER ADDAMS FAMILY MOVIE THEY MAKE IT GOOD LIKE THEY FIRST TWO AND PUT EFERT IN TO IT AND THEY PUT ANJELICA HUSTON IN IT.

BAD STUPID FILM THAT DID NOT PAY NO THIG TO THE FIRST TOO
I THAT THIS FILM WAS WAS GO TO BE GOOD BUT IT WAS VERY BAD THE FLIM I NOT ANTHIG LIKE THE FIRST TWO THAT WERE GOOD MOVIES that were a lotlike th 60 tv seris addams family reunin was just a ripe of flim plot did not make any sense to me horblie film the way they made addams family in this one they made them at like were stupid family when they relly wernt what wenday and pugley did made sense the granny accted werid in this one and feter not played by critfer loynd in this flim accted like he was inpain all the time dont see it it is very very very bad flim just buy or see the first two there worth every peny.

Not as horrible as people think...
Well, the actors and actresses were different from the first two movies, but that was to be expected, considering how one was dead, and two were too old to look the part, but all in all, not a bad film at all.

I have been watching Addams-related media for quite some time, and although this film isn't much better than the others, it is certainly a far cry from being much WORSE as well.

The toughest part of this film was getting used to the new faces. After that, the second toughest part was getting used to the poor graphics given to the killer dog, but those are just inconsistensies and budget issues that could hardly be avoided...

Thing was still a blast, Wednesday was still a lovable deadpan, Pugley was still a delinquent, etc, etc... I found almost nothing wrong with the film except for what I mentioned above.

Now a lot of people say the plot was common. This is only partially true. I agree that I wouldn't be surprised to see a plot like this showcased in the classic '60s series, but there would not have been as much adventure if it had been in that series. Not only that, there is so little FAITHFUL Addams material coming out nowadays, we should feel blessed as long as they don't become the brady bunch. (I have been rather Addams-starved for a while.) I don't think I can explain it better than that.

So all in all, a nice little film that doesn't tread on our memories and stays faithful to our well-established characters. A continuation of what's already been started, and really, isn't that what every sequal ought to be? ... Read more

Amazon.com

Smart and sardonic, Just Can't Get Enough begins with a cheeky, freeze-frame interruption of a major character's murder, accompanied by wistful narration about the end of Chippendales' glory days. You can tell that this sorry story about the infamous male strip club is going to be just sharp enough to keep it from drowning in soft-core froth.

Based on fact, the film stars Jonathan Aube as hunky naif Chad Patterson, fresh from graduate school but lured by big money and sleazy opportunities afforded by Chippendales, where the lust of women is big business and seething grudges between the owner (Shelley Malil) and an untrustworthy choreographer (Peter Nevargic) spill over into homicidal conspiracies. Too much of the film plays like a poor man's Boogie Nights, with beefcake morons wasting away as temptation takes its toll. But the key performances of Malil and Nevargic are crisp and interesting, and the dance-floor action never stalls. --Tom Keogh ... Read more

Reviews (7)

Worth watching once...maybe twice...
For the hot guys only.

Sadly the film doesn't stand up to much critical scrutiny. The acting is uneven with some performances being good and others laughable. The script is also uneven, laden with cliches. The costuming and make-up is far worse. I know that this is a period piece set in the early 80's, but the wigs look atrocious -- exactly how they shouldn't -- like wigs!

Yeah, the guys are hot enough and there is even some (but not enough) full frontal male nudity, so it might be worth a second look, but overall the production qualities leave much to be desired.

Doing It The American Way
Given the subject matter, you expect this independent film by director/writer David Payne to be full of naked bodies gyrating to the beat of club music--certainly not a serious movie with plenty of bite. But JUST CAN'T GET ENOUGH scores in both directions, and in spite of the abundance of skin on display it is the story rather than the bodies that linger in mind after the movie ends.

As seen through the eyes of club worker Chad (Johnathan Abue, playing a role loosely based on real-life Dan Peterson), JUST CAN'T GET ENOUGH is surprisingly dark and surprisingly factual. Steve Banerjee (Shelley Malil) is just another club owner until he stumbles into the idea of male strippers playing to a women-only audience, and the ringing cash register attracts ambitious and obnoxious choreographer Nick Denoia (Peter Nevargic). Once Denoia gets wise to Banerjee's shady dealings he quickly blackmails the club owner into signing away the touring rights to the show. But when it comes to underhanded manipulations, Banerjee proves Denoia's equal and then some: the sex, drugs, and rock and roll atmosphere of the club quickly gives way to a headlong rush into murder, and the ride is straight down all the way.

Payne's script isn't as tight as it might be, and it sometimes goes off on tangents that add little to the overall impact of the film, but the actors are first rate all the way and increasingly convoluted nature of the conspiracies and counter-conspiracies make for a fascinating ride. And to up the ante, Payne endows the entire film with an unexpectedly dark humor and sense of irony that rings true even in the movie's weaker moments.

Yes, there are plenty of naked bodies (both male and female) on display, but ultimately JUST CAN'T GET ENOUGH is less about sex than it is about an extremely unsavory and seldom acknowledged side of the American dream, a drive for success that flattens every moral obstacle it meets. In one particularly memorable scene, Banerjee snarls that Joe Kennedy built his fortune on illegal bootleg liquor and even sitting President Reagan lied to congress to finance a secret war; bending the law is the American way. But not every one can get away with it--and even for those who do there is a price. In this instance the price ranges from emotional deadness to drug addiction to accidental incest to blood. And every one has to pay.

GFT, Amazon Reviewer

Amazing Soundtrack
There's something charming about this movie. It's scrappy, rough around the edges, and fun. I wasn't sure what to think with the lame o box, but it's full of surprises. For one, the music. Who knew this movie was packed with wall to wall 80s gems like Wall of Vodoo and Flock of Seagulls? And also, the humor. You couldn't tell by the cover, but this is a really funny story, especially if you appreciate odd human behavior. The marketing guys should be slapped silly, because I passed by the movie a dozen times before finally deciding to purchase it, and I'm glad I did.

really, really bad
Wow, what a piece of work - this movie is even worse than "The Chippendales Murders" on USA. The guys aren't that hot, and the film just drags on and on. A rental might provide some amusement, but this is most definitely not a purchase-worthy DVD.

95 minutes of my life I'll never get back
Just Can't Get Enough is a story, I guess, about the creator of the Chippendale's, and his struggles with the man that took the show on the road. The creator has that man killed, why, nobody knows. The guy running the touring show was making his company a lot of money. Then 3 strippers break off from the Chippendales, and the creator wants them killed. Why? He can't take the competition. Well. Who cares about this dreadful story anyway. There are holes in it bigger than J.P. Pitoc's hair. So with a movie like this, with no plot, shouldn't we at least see what we expect to see, some manhood? Well, no, the guys are dancing in the 1980's, and their hair is awful, and costumes are tacky. Their bodies are okay, but come on, that hair, and those mustaches? Good grief. And we get to see one piece of male equipment. And it's tiny. This movie is so not good. ... Read more

Reviews (7)

Worth watching once...maybe twice...
For the hot guys only.

Sadly the film doesn't stand up to much critical scrutiny. The acting is uneven with some performances being good and others laughable. The script is also uneven, laden with cliches. The costuming and make-up is far worse. I know that this is a period piece set in the early 80's, but the wigs look atrocious -- exactly how they shouldn't -- like wigs!

Yeah, the guys are hot enough and there is even some (but not enough) full frontal male nudity, so it might be worth a second look, but overall the production qualities leave much to be desired.

Doing It The American Way
Given the subject matter, you expect this independent film by director/writer David Payne to be full of naked bodies gyrating to the beat of club music--certainly not a serious movie with plenty of bite. But JUST CAN'T GET ENOUGH scores in both directions, and in spite of the abundance of skin on display it is the story rather than the bodies that linger in mind after the movie ends.

As seen through the eyes of club worker Chad (Johnathan Abue, playing a role loosely based on real-life Dan Peterson), JUST CAN'T GET ENOUGH is surprisingly dark and surprisingly factual. Steve Banerjee (Shelley Malil) is just another club owner until he stumbles into the idea of male strippers playing to a women-only audience, and the ringing cash register attracts ambitious and obnoxious choreographer Nick Denoia (Peter Nevargic). Once Denoia gets wise to Banerjee's shady dealings he quickly blackmails the club owner into signing away the touring rights to the show. But when it comes to underhanded manipulations, Banerjee proves Denoia's equal and then some: the sex, drugs, and rock and roll atmosphere of the club quickly gives way to a headlong rush into murder, and the ride is straight down all the way.

Payne's script isn't as tight as it might be, and it sometimes goes off on tangents that add little to the overall impact of the film, but the actors are first rate all the way and increasingly convoluted nature of the conspiracies and counter-conspiracies make for a fascinating ride. And to up the ante, Payne endows the entire film with an unexpectedly dark humor and sense of irony that rings true even in the movie's weaker moments.

Yes, there are plenty of naked bodies (both male and female) on display, but ultimately JUST CAN'T GET ENOUGH is less about sex than it is about an extremely unsavory and seldom acknowledged side of the American dream, a drive for success that flattens every moral obstacle it meets. In one particularly memorable scene, Banerjee snarls that Joe Kennedy built his fortune on illegal bootleg liquor and even sitting President Reagan lied to congress to finance a secret war; bending the law is the American way. But not every one can get away with it--and even for those who do there is a price. In this instance the price ranges from emotional deadness to drug addiction to accidental incest to blood. And every one has to pay.

GFT, Amazon Reviewer

Amazing Soundtrack
There's something charming about this movie. It's scrappy, rough around the edges, and fun. I wasn't sure what to think with the lame o box, but it's full of surprises. For one, the music. Who knew this movie was packed with wall to wall 80s gems like Wall of Vodoo and Flock of Seagulls? And also, the humor. You couldn't tell by the cover, but this is a really funny story, especially if you appreciate odd human behavior. The marketing guys should be slapped silly, because I passed by the movie a dozen times before finally deciding to purchase it, and I'm glad I did.

really, really bad
Wow, what a piece of work - this movie is even worse than "The Chippendales Murders" on USA. The guys aren't that hot, and the film just drags on and on. A rental might provide some amusement, but this is most definitely not a purchase-worthy DVD.

95 minutes of my life I'll never get back
Just Can't Get Enough is a story, I guess, about the creator of the Chippendale's, and his struggles with the man that took the show on the road. The creator has that man killed, why, nobody knows. The guy running the touring show was making his company a lot of money. Then 3 strippers break off from the Chippendales, and the creator wants them killed. Why? He can't take the competition. Well. Who cares about this dreadful story anyway. There are holes in it bigger than J.P. Pitoc's hair. So with a movie like this, with no plot, shouldn't we at least see what we expect to see, some manhood? Well, no, the guys are dancing in the 1980's, and their hair is awful, and costumes are tacky. Their bodies are okay, but come on, that hair, and those mustaches? Good grief. And we get to see one piece of male equipment. And it's tiny. This movie is so not good. ... Read more