Reviews (97)

"The Living Daylights": Nobody does it better!
With the release of "The Living Daylights", Bond fans finally saw another "Golden Bond Film" in the classic tradition of "Goldfinger". This film was, hands down, the best of the Dalton era films - the only other Bond movie with Dalton being the mildly disappointing "License to Kill". Timothy Dalton replaced Roger Moore as agent 007 when the gray haired Moore decided to call it quits after the release of "A View to a Kill" in the mid-eighties. Naturally, with a new Bond came a new style. I believe that Dalton's style was the most compensating to Ian Flemming's Bond; he wasn't a super man all of the time. He has moments when doubt or fears enter his mind. In other words, Dalton is a much more realistic Bond than Connery or Moore ever were. Unfortunately for Dalton, however, it seems many people like the unrealistic Bond better than the realistic.

"The Living Daylights" has a classic story and action. It's one for all Bond fans to definitely see, while being good enough to warrant the attention of first time viewers. No film (except perhaps "Goldfinger") has done it better than "The Living Daylights".

Timothy Dalton as Ian Fleming's James Bond 007
As a child of the 70's and 80's,The Roger Moore-era movies defined the tone of the entire James Bond 007 series.When Moore left the series after A View To A Kill,Timothy Dalton took over and put Bond in a direction that was familier to readers of Ian Fleming's novels, yet confusing to moivegoers.
The Living Daylights (1987)brought an end to the tongue and cheek tone of Moore's movies.Instead,Dalton becomes the 007 of the original novels,Tough,ruthless ,yet still refined. Dalton read the original novels and redefined the roll.
Unfortunately,movie goers were a bit uneasy with a James Bond who didn't crack cheesy one liners,jump into bed with an average of three women per movie and was harder edged than any other Bond on the screen.
The movie itself is a fine, yet slow-paced, involving a latter-day cold war defection of a Soviet soldier, only to be turn into a plot involving the elimination of British spies.Great scenes include an escape from the iron curtain in an updated Aston Marten, and an airplane cargo fight in mid air.
Dalton only portrayed Bond one more time (License to Kill) before the series was in limbo for six years (until Goldeneye with Pierce Brosnan in 1995).Since then, Dalton's portrayal of Bond has been praised in it's approach to bring Bond back to where it all began.

Dangerous Bond
The taglines for this, the 15th Bond entry, promised- "The most dangerous Bond ever," and right there beyond the flippant fun that Roger Moore had brought, THE LIVING DAYLIGHTS came and made good on that vow. In a cool, totally decked-out Aston Martin, our favorite spy propels himself into this, the last of the series' Cold War intrigues (furthermore being the final title penned by its creator, Ian Fleming). And herein, the flavour of Fleming is found everywhere-

Having been a child of 007's Roger Moore era, I had- on some seven different occasions during the course of his 14-year reign as Bond- looked forward with great anticipation to the very heights of fun and adventure. Moore, with his infectious charm and cheeky wit, was absolutely and completely entertaining as Bond. So I was naturally a little edgy when, in 1987, he retired, to pass the torch to another actor.

I was in college, studying English literature when I heard Timothy Dalton would be the next James Bond. To me, this seemed an exceedingly interesting choice- for here was a classically trained Welsh actor, who at that time had been fairly unknown. Yet I already knew him, of course: not only had he made his impression in some of the Shakespeare plays I'd been studying, but this ardent, sensitive actor had actually won my heart with his perfect portrayals of two beloved Bronte heroes- (Charlotte's "Rochester" and Emily's "Heathcliff.") Needless to say, I just couldn't wait for this one~~

THE LIVING DAYLIGHTS is a spy thriller in every classical sense. From the get-go, it's exciting: the gun-barrel sequence, where John Barry's arrangement pulses more quickly to keep in tempo with the motion of a more youthful 007- the exhilarating pre-credits: where, after a parachute jump onto the Rock of Gibraltar, a double-0 agent gets murdered and Bond jumps onto the roof of a speeding jeep as it hurtles down the cliff, and requites the assassin in like. He then lands emergently onto a yacht- where, by sheer coincidence, the bikini-clad babe onboard has been lamenting her failure to find any "real men" anywhere. Bond grabs her phone to call headquarters, introducing himself with a brisk offhand, "Bond, James Bond". She offers him champagne and, as a consequence, he's an hour late reporting back........

After opening credits - Maurice Binder's flowing artwork gracing John Barry's title song- (a colorful pop number performed by Ah-Ha that won't ever let you forget it's the 80's), Bond reports to Bratislava for a seemingly unrelated assignment. Saunders, of section V, Vienna (Thomas Wheatley) has arranged the defection of a top KGB agent, Georgi Koskov (Jeroen Krabbé). Bond is called in to kill the sniper assigned to assassinate Koskov if he should try to bolt. -This scene makes up the whole of Fleming's short story, wherein our hero turns over in his mind the conflicting implications of his work. Well, it's apparent that this James Bond is definitely a man who, though despising certain aspects of his profession, is quite capable of killing an enemy sniper in cold blood. The sniper, however, turns out being the lovely woman cellist that Bond had only moments before been admiring. And Bond, who follows instincts before orders, observes, "that girl didn't know one end of a rifle from the other," and instead of killing her, shoots the weapon from her hand.

Nevertheless, the coup is a grand success. Hours later, in a safe house on the English countryside- (wherein Bond shows himself to be a connoisseur of good food: "The foie gras is excellent," and champagne: "The brand on the list was questionable, so I took the liberty of choosing something different.") -Koskov reveals a sinister plot by General Pushkin (John Rhys-Davies), the head of the KGB, to kill foreign spies- ("Smiert Spionen," Fleming's SMERSH term meaning death to spies). Bond is immediately a little skeptical of Koskov's story, and his suspicions are further enhanced when, shortly thereafter, Koskov gets snatched out of Britain by forces unknown -pulled off by henchman Necros (Andreas Wisniewski), disguised as the most menacing milkman one could ever imagine. For answers, Bond returns to Czechoslovakia to investigate that female "sniper," and discovers she's Kara Milovy (Maryam d'Abo), Koskov's girlfriend. He then poses as Koskov's friend in the hope that she'll be able to locate him.

The inertia of this complex plot carries Bond further, through a number of beautiful locales in the world- London, Vienna, Tangier, Afghanistan, and New York. His mission involves drugs, deceit, diamonds, eccentric American arms dealer Brad Whitaker (Joe Don Baker), and the Afghan resistance, Mujahadin. There's action aplenty - highlights being a car chase in the Aston Martin fully armed, a ski chase downslope in a cello case, and a seat-gripping airplane ride I'd never in a million years want to ride!

The late 80's had safe-sex everywhere afoot - even in Bond. Kara's certainly endearing as the Bond girl, but she doesn't hold the screen next to Bond so well as many of her predecessors. The villains are undeniably wonderful: a swarthy combination of the fearsome and the ludicrous. And Dalton's tough, gritty Bond is as close to Ian Fleming's creation that any actor has come- yet whether or not that's a good thing is a matter of infinite debate. The cinematic Bond had already been well established by then. Like Connery, though, Dalton has a certain cat-like grace, albeit minus the twinkle in his eye. And though he brings an intensity to the character that even Connery could not own, he never really does let loose - never hams it up or has the famous fun that every other Bond has had! But notwithstanding all that, I'm forever disposed to find him perfect.

first good bond in a long time and daltons great
the last decent bond movie before this was for your eyes only.
then came dalton.
despite what the brosnan fans like to believe dalton was asked twice to be bond, several years before brosnan was even considered.
and when dalton finally took his turn at bond, he delivered.
this one is a bit better than the follow up, which, though featuring a very fine performance from dalton, was a bit too much like a miami vice episode.
dalton gives us his bond which is different than either connery or moore and its a valid and etertaining one.
the first three major bonds all had their own take and all three are enjoyable.
actually, it is brosnan who really delivers nothing new.
dalton's bond is an assassin, albeit one with morales
and for the first and last time bond is NOT a [prostitute]. he has one girlfriend in this and his lack of bed jumping is refreshing.
the quiet intensity dalton gives the character is unequaled by the actors who played the role before and since.
actually he is the best 'actor' to play the character, though connery is the best bond of course.
though living daylights is a bit too long and sags at times and joe don baker is badly miscast, its a succesful entry in the franchise.
grab a beer and some popcorn.

a decent entry with a great bond
the brosnan fans have it wrong. dead wrong.
and the facts are there in print!
dalton was asked twice. long BEFORE brosnan.
dalton turned it down twice before accepting ONLY AFTER brosnan couldnt commit.
for a very long time (way back when moore was even still fresh into it) the original producers both felt dalton would be the quintessential bond.
and, while this movie and it's sequal are decent (not great) they do contain an original performance from dalton.
far more original than brosnan, who is a mix of connery, moore AND dalton.
as a matter of fact, if one has ever even read the original books, dalton is much closer to fleming's bond than connery even was.
and dalton is undoubtedly the best ACTOR that has played bond.
check out the inner intensity in many of his scenes here (popping the balloon after his fellow agent has been killed) and for once, bond isnt (...) his way through the movie. he has one girlfriend and the film does benefit from not going overboard on the bordello activities.
that said, the movie is tooooo long and joe don baker is god awful in an campy, over the top performance.
still, we do have dalton and, sorry pierce, you dont hold a candle to this actor. ... Read more

Reviews (4)

A QUANDARY FOR MS. SIEMASZKO
The lovely Nina Siemaszko is faced with the quandary of choosing between two adept lovers, the suave continental Phillipe or a wholesome all American type who is just a delivery boy to the office where she works. However, the latter does get her into an elevator where he shows her, to her delight, just how adept he is. Phillipe, though, is no fool and can make her wiggle with delight in bed too. Plenty of nipple kissing and simulated sex here. She resolves the quandry by dumping both. I would suggest that another solution would be to have her engage in what the adult film industry calls a DP.

Recommended
I've been into this Red Shoe-concept since its inception, mostly due to the presence of David Duchovny, so I've viewed a good many of these segments. The segment involving Richard Tyson is absolutely a breed apart from most anything I've seen in the soft-core category. Maybe all that means is that I've led a sheltered life. In any case, I've (watched ...) this video more than once, and I strongly encourage others to view it as well.

EXCELLENT SOFT CORE FILM
An excellent soft core film from the Showtime Red Shoe Diaries series, not all of which are on video. High production values and a pretty good plot. It's always a pleasure to see Nina Siemaszko, a very beautiful and sexy woman, in action. I recently saw her in "Sinatra" where she does a pretty good job portraying Mia Farrow, one of Sinatra's wives.

very cool and with taste
have been watching these for a while and we are not ever tired of them, they are done very nicely and very erotic for lovers only for sure ... Read more

Description

When evil extra-terrestrials kidnap an Earth scientist, He returns three years later as an alien. ... Read more

Reviews (8)

An alien classic film
I will never forget this film. I saw this film at the age of thirteen and the re-birth scene was extremely disturbing to my mind. It changes my sinless mind for ever like Adan and Eve when they feel the impact of the original sin. I couldn't sleep that terrible night. The re-birth scene was like a brainstorm in my mind and I feel the most strange situation of mind damage in all my life. Now, I want to see it again but at the same time I feel scared. Its the most strange alien classic, but that's why you would never forget it. Please, excuse if there is some incorrect word because I am a latin american from Puerto Rico.

Still in my brain 20 years later...
I saw this movie back when it first came out on video. People always talk about cult movies but this is one they don't talk about. It is such a "B Flick" that you're embarrassed to admit you've seen it but at the same time it sticks with you. If you see this as I did (an impressionable 14-year-old) it will definitely shake you up a bit. Watch it a few times and you'll never forget it. You have to watch it more than once to truly appreciate it.

A strangely disturbing horror film
This is one of those movies (like the bargain-basement "Carnival of Souls" or the Japanese "Attack of the Mushroom People") which critics and audiences immediately write off, and yet the images and atmosphere seem to creep up in your psyche and stick with you for years. The concept: Daddy disappears, later returns a changed man, and everything falls apart. Sort of a wacky reinterpretation of the Judeo-Christian apocalypse, with Christ's return signalling the end of everything we know. The special effects are superb on this film, as evidenced in the rebirthing scene, but it is the unseen and implied which makes this film truly horrifying (what WAS that creature they ran into?). Philip Sayer is perfect as the quiet, transformed "father" of all the horror, and his performance is a large part of why the film is so disturbing. Maryam D'Abo adds little to the piece aside from her value as a sexual object (which she ultimately becomes in the film, in a horrific way). This film confounds our expectations, which all horror films should seek to do. Of course it is low-budget and low-brow, but that doesn't detract from its ability to frighten its audience. Years after I first saw it, this film still has the power to give me the creeps.

An All Time Bizarro Classic
Okay, okay, so Xtro is no academy award winner, but in terms of sheer bizarre entertainment, it can't be topped. I first remember seeing Xtro when I was about 9. It was a strange film experience that I never forgot, if you see it you will certainly understand why. Xtro has to have one of the most disturbing and entertaining birth scenes of any film, ever, period. I happen to own a vhs copy of Xtro that has been seen many times by myself and friends and family alike. Check it out if you have a sense of humor and an apreciation for cheesy sci-fi.

it came from above....
As far as these types of alien films go, this is one of the better ones. Considering when it was made and the budget the filmakers had to work with, they have done a pretty decent job. Yes, there are scenes where it crosses into foolishness (the army doll hunting down the old hag in the downstairs apartment comes to mind) but there are also some pretty gruesome and intense scenes as well.
The story beings as "Sam" is abducted by aliens. His son is the only witness. Some years later he returns and goes right to work savaging a local lass. She gives birth to his human form (this scene is not for the squesmish..)and he goes on to disrupt the lives of his old family. The end of this film has some real nice scenes of bodily deterioration as Sams body breaks down exposing his alien form within. This is an entertaining, albeit average entry in the field of alien terror. ... Read more

Reviews (1)

Save your money on this one
If you're a big Maryam D'Abo fan (like me), this is THE movie to see, since she appears au naturel a lot. If not, trust me, save your money on this one: a bigger bomb you won't be able to find! The two stars are only for gorgeous Ms. D'Abo sake; otherwise you'll never forgive yourself for spending two hours of your valuable lifetime watching this trash, not to mention your hard earned money buying it! ... Read more

Reviews (4)

B-Action Starring Lambert and Kerry Fox ("Shallow Grave")
Just another B-action flick starring Christopher Lambert. I didn't expect much, but some names on the cover interested me; they were co-starring Kerry Fox ("Shallow Grave" and "Intimacy"), and the director John Glen, who is behind the camera of James Bond films made in the 1980s (from "For Your Eyes Only" to "Licence to Kill"). Not that I mean his works are great -- Roger Moore played Bond at that time, and good as he was, the actions were not particulary great. But Kerry Fox is another matter.

The result is just what I expected, and I don't blame anybody for spending 90 minutes on my life for this ... one. Lambert is a kind of member of secret team who seem to deal with assassination of terrorists. But the team, though apparently successful in killing the target, made a botched job afterwards, losing some of the members, and then they are forced to disband themselves. However, Christopher Lambert's character is not convinced that their target is dead, and the ex-members of his team, now hiding with another identity, get bumped off one after another.

The story is so-so, and the acting is not bad. Kerry Fox is called even fabulous among them, raising the below-average action flick to a little higher place. But the cheap action scenes and tedious development of story kill every good thing in the film. The relation between Lambert and Fox -- they were once lovers, and Fox is pregnant even though she is hired by the secret agency -- is very interesting, but the film throws away any potential thrills coming from the characters so easily that I wondered how the original book deals with those elements. Perhaps, the original book (which I haven't seen) is better than this film.

Christopher Lambert made a satisfactory films in the past, like "Knight Moves" and others, but around the time of "Highlander 2" or "The Hunted", I began to lose interest in his films, and I'm sorry to say this, but things don't change after watching this awful flick. This film is far better than "Fortress 2", but like Pam Grier in that dreadful film, Kerry Fox is wasted.

Lambert really can act...
If you are a Lambert fan (like me), then you'll be surprised by his performance in this movie. It ranks up with Mortal Kombat in films he actually pulls off well.

However, if you're looking for a good story, stick with Highlander.

"I might be stupid, but I'm not crazy"
Fans of Christopher Lambert will be willing to see any movie he is in, regardless of the apparent quality of the feature. If you are not a fanatic of his films, more likely than not you might remember him from the Highlander moviess, his most mainstream work. The rest of us know him from such B grade action thrillers as Resurrection, Gunmen, Knight Moves, and Beowulf. Fear not, as The Point Men has a much higher quality level than most of his features, and this can be likely attributed to having a seasoned director such as John Glen at the helm. The story itself is nothing new; in fact it has been done so many times one has to wonder if there are any new paths one could take with it anymore. Think of how many films you have seen about an elite team working for a government doing things that no one would ever want to know about. Yet these films continue to be made because the formula, though worn, can still produce an entertaining feature given the right direction and stars. Also, the script makes an effort, albeit a small one, to not lay everything out in the open right away, and instead let it come out in layers.

There are some elements of the story that keep this one down, and they do so because they simply make no sense. With B grade films, even higher quality ones such as this, you do need to let things go, but in this case, several of them are difficult. Such as the fact that it is never really explained who the person was in the beginning who they all thought was the real Amar. Then there is the ease in which Amar travels to one country one day and back the next before sundown. If you can manage to let that and a few other tiny flubs go, it is easy sailing, and if you then consider other Lambert films, it gets even easier. The problems are simple sloppiness, perhaps laziness in not wanting to explain something and just pushing the story along instead.

Christopher Lambert here is, well, Christopher Lambert, and just about the same as he is in any movie on a more toned down level. He is a lot more restrained here, which suits his character very well. It is Vincent Regan who plays the evil Amar that is given the over the top role to play this time, and he does so with much glee. While in the beginning he came off a little on the goofy side, when his true motivations are put out into the open, he does manage to become much more menacing. Also, Regan is great in Amar's many attempts to change his personality to get closer to people in order to eventually kill them. This is one of the best aspects to the movie: a villain who seems capable of doing the things he does. All to often in these kinds of movies (such as the ultimate villain in Ronin being a disappointment) the villain is weak or turns out to be a disappointment. Kerry Fox (from Shallow Grave), who plays Lambert's love interest and fellow agent, Maddy, is also very good in her role as a seasoned veteran of her craft.

Essentially, as it has already been stated, if you are a fan of the "Christopher Lambert Genre" then you must rent this one as soon as possible. If you are just getting into his movies, this is a good one to start off with to ease yourself into it gently.

Subpar, hasty adaptation of a decent novel
The Heat of Ramadan, Steven Hartov's first novel, deserved a better film adaptation than this low budget, poorly edited disappointment. The plot was very promising and you could sense the potential. Perhaps veteran action film director John Glen (The Wild Geese, The Spy Who Loved Me, Moonraker) ran short of time, money, or talent.

For a better film on international terrorism, try instead The Little Drummer Girl, directed by George Roy Hill in 1984 and based on the novel by John Le Carre. ... Read more

Reviews (8)

no no no...only a go for Grieco fans
This movie has a really abstruse storyline, and not in a positive way. You might like to see Mr. Grieco walking around half naked but that is basically it. Even the female blonde in that movie does not seem to be a good choice. It's all a bit awkward.

Aquired a likeing for it.
It may not be "Meet Joe Black" or great for an emmy, but it does have a certain mood that I do like it for. Even if you or others may think it is more like a poor B or C mild porn. I did like it for one reason many B movies carry an idea that they could not afford, but they cast the perfect person for this role. He may be a hansome picture for woman but, you couldnt cast brad pitt for this movie. Some how the movie made its point, the style that it was trying to get across wich most of the most expencive movies arent worth much in reaching. If you dont like anything that dosnt match up to "Jurasic Park" than dont bother, go watch "Scream3" or something.

Pro-watcher
This movie makes you melt, not to mention it gets the ... ... it's steamy, hot, and sexy. The plot is even better then the eroticism this movie inflicts. It's a must see, despite the low-budget appearance.

Richard is on the prowl.
If you are an "I can't get enough of this guys bod!" fan like myself, then this is a must see. He is VERY sexy in this role & it's a thourghly watchable plot (it's been a while sence i saw it but it has something to do with him being geniticly crossed with tomcat genes, he's a catburgler *Ha-Ha* by trade & looking to get down with a female , as tomcats do). But...if you are just wanting to see it for the movie itself, don't bother.

Look what the cat dragged in!
Lonesome and frustrated wallflower Maryam D'Abo (hipergorgeous as usual) is some sorta female Dr Frankenstein who makes a tomcat out of a gym rat (Grieco) in order to have a lover.

CAN YOU BELIEVE THAT? Then this your kinda picture. Me, I prefer my sci-fi with a little common sense!

Nevertheless, don't miss the first scenes! ... Read more

Description

One of the most epic adventure stories of all time comes powerfully to life in this original four-hour epic-series. Filmed inexotic locales with an international cast and featuring state-of-the-artspecial effects, Helen of Troy depicts one of the greatest battles everfought to win the love of the world's most beautiful woman. Though married to Menelaus, King of Sparta, Helen (Sienna Guillory) falls madly in love with Paris (Matthew Marsden) a handsome Trojanprince. Together, the lovers flee to Troy, where they are given safehaven by Paris' father, King Priam (John Rhys-Davies). Bent on bringing Helen back, the king's ruthless brother Agememnon (Rufus Sewell) leads the skilled Spartan army to the shores of the fabled city. There theGreeks lay siege to Troy, thus beginning one of history's most legendarywars which would ultimately decide the destinies of two empires. ... Read more

Reviews (73)

"The Face that Launched a Thousand Ships"
Homer's "Iliad" is perhaps the most famous piece of epic poetry in the world, chronicling the ten year siege of Troy and the actions taken by the brothers Menelaus and Agamemnon to win back Menelaus' wife Helen, stolen from her home by Paris, a prince of Troy.

In recreating the tale, the people at Hallmark have taken some liberties in presenting the story, some small and understandable, some large and baffling. Basically, if you're hoping for a loyal representation to Homer's text, this is not the movie to watch: despite the four hour running time a lot of material is omitted, the personalities of some characters are utterly changed, and fabricated events seem to have no real importance.

The story actually begins with Paris - his birth and his abandonment, leading up to the famous choice between the three goddesses: with Aphrodite promising the love of the most beautiful woman in the world, and to his reinstating as prince in Troy. In fact, he is given so much attention, that its a little confusing when his character drops somewhat from the action later on. Helen at this time is a reasonably young child (at least that's what everyone around her says - she looks pretty old to me), and is kidnapped by King Theseus, which eventually leads to his and her brother's death. Deemed cursed by her father, she is offered to the kings of neighbouring lands. Through a game of chance, she is given to Menelaus, though the timing could not be worse: soon after arrives a delegation from Troy, bearing with them Prince Paris...

In recreating the citadel of Troy and the landscapes of Greece, the film-makers triumph wonderfully: most of the special effects are just as good as one would expect on the big screen, and the scale of the movie is as huge as one would expect. Nifty camera movements, such as the vertical circling of the Trojan Horse to present its collosal size, are amazing, as are the shots of the armies and fleets moving toward Troy.

Characterisation suffers a bit, however. Out of everyone, Agamemnon goes from what could potentially be the most sympathetic hero out of everyone, to a mere brute. Through him, the siege does not become a war of pride to retrieve Helen, but to conquer for power and spoils. I love Rufus Sewell, and his grief in sacrificing his daughter is portrayed excellently by the actor (he admits to Helen that she and the city are not worth what he had to do), but the rape of Helen in front of the burning city took things a little too far. Scholars will be disguisted.

Paris also, goes from a rather cowardly youth, to every girl's dream: loving, romantic, protective of Helen, and so on. Achilles, Odysseus and Hector's roles are too short to be interesting. Menelaus is perhaps a bit young, rather than an imposing king in his own right, but his character is an intriging one, who is perhaps genuinely in love with Helen, but unable to show it. Two excellently portrayed characters are King Priam (John Rhys-Davis - could you expect anything less from him?) and Cassandra (who "Pride and Prejudice" fans will recognise as Georgiana) - her hysteria and terror are perfectly portrayed, as are her horrific visions.

But as the title suggests, it is Helen that the movie centres on, and I actually thought a rather good attempt was made to untangle her motivations and character. Tired of being a trophy bride, she seeks out true love, she tries to put an end to the war, she suffers guilt at the deaths of those around her, and seems reasonably perseptive. However, a more accomplished actress was needed to pull off this difficult role, something that new-comer Sienna Guillroy just can't do. Instead the director takes every oppurtunity he can to show off her bare bottom, even if its to the extreme of parading naked in front of an entire room full of soldiers.

It almost comes across as a preview to Wolfgang Peterson's epic movie "Troy", and so it would have been nice to have included some of the more mystical aspects of the god's involvement in the war, as "Troy" is also apparently stripped of their presence. All in all, a good production, but I have no wish to see it a second time.

Better than TROY !
This movie, although its less glamorous than the new Troy with Brad Pitt, is closer to the truth story. Menelaus and Agamemnon don't die in Troy just because they are the bad guys!!! Hello!!! Who wrote the script to the movie called TROY anyway? He was having a bad trip, I can tell you that! The only negative point in HELEN OF TROY is the almost bad acting and Achiles was bald??? C'mon give me a break! Better shoot some nice horror b-movies guys! You should better read the real thing!

Very well put together
I quite like this TV-Movie version of the story of Troy, and I'm glad I viewed it before watching the blockbuster version with Brad Pitt. Apparently this version is far more accurate and more closely aligned with Homer's Iliad and it gives a much better background in the story of Paris and Helen. Significant changes were made in the Brad Pitt version of the battle of Troy which made it hard for me to accept. However, since the actors are all good loking and the costumes are historically accurate, I'm willing to forgive this minor slight.

Watch this version as well to compare the difference. The battle scenes and special effects are B-rated compared to Peterson's version of Troy, but the story is more accurate and the acting is much better.

This Trash Departs From Homer to Depict Graphic Rape.
Boring, sadistic, exploitative version of story, altered to include graphic nudity and graphic rape of Helen. Disgusting!

prior reviews lack perception
I am sick and tired of these two-bit movie watchers that know nothing about good acting pretending to review a performance. In the process of reviewing this 3rd rate movie some people have seemed inclined to put down the theatrical release of "Troy". Wrong ! To the point: Brad Pitt. I have watched him give silly and idiotic performances and I have watched him give great performances the result of great focus. Troy is a great performance - period !!!. The problem that occurs is that just because people consider him good-looking they automatically feel that he can't act. To be honest, this time around Pitt looks much older than usual. The point is that once you get past the looks factor you have a deep, well-focused performance. Period ! ... Read more

Reviews (4)

When Pigs Fly
Well, perhaps you won't have to wait that long to see this gem of a British comedy from the late Nineties. Good thing, too, if you like this sort of thing: quirky, smart, fresh, and completely disarming. It seems to have come in rather below the radar of most film viewers in the U.S., and it's still (as of Sept. '03) available only on VHS in the States. Start lobbying now for a DVD viewable in America, 'cause you're going to want to own it, and you're going to want to show it to all your friends--all, that is, who might be in the mood for something offbeat and weird. (A Jewish-British quest romance, anyone?) But the film eludes simple categorization. It's hard to imagine how any casual flight of whimsy could have produced this particular, tender riff on the classic coming-of-age situation. Be forewarned, though, guys: it's a bad choice for a date movie.

Leon The Pig Farmer
This was a strange movie, but I love it. It was very funny. And the reilgous jokes were not that bad. Mark Frankel did a great job. I love the whole part were he is at the bowling alley. When he got hit in the face by the ball, I never thought I was going to stop laughing. It was a great movie. Everyone should see it. I would buy it for a friend

Thanks
Rbecca Brown

A GREAT, GREAT MOVIE!
A wonderful, funny, thoughtful movie with Jewish themes, concerning identity, family and love. Strongly recommended. I bought this movie several years ago after seeing it at the Palm Springs film festival. Also has a very good "jazz" sound tract.

A not-so-kosher romantic comedy
If you have strong religious views better skip this one. If not, this is a hilarious little British gem done in the best Richard Lester tradition, with lots of talent and practically no money at all.. Wonderful performances all around (notably the late Mark Frankel) but Maryam D'Abo steals the show as the ultimate goy sex kitten from hell! Great fun! ... Read more

Reviews (4)

TIMELOCK WHAT???
OK, I read the reviews and still bought this movie...
Maryam D'abo is starting to show her age in this low budget Sci-fi Non-thriller. I had remembered seeing this movie somewhere but mainly bought it because I liked D'abo in some other flicks.
The best parts of the movie are the moments of 20th century comic relief provided by Ayre Gross (a Cyber thief sent to the wrong prison). Not much more I can say except wait to see it on [tv].
P.S. What the title of the movie has to do WITH the movie I am still trying to figure out(maybe I snoozed thru that part).
Happy viewing................

A big pile of stinky cheez, Yes...this is a stinky [item]!
Well, I went in to this film knowing full well it was no "Star wars" but this was extra cheezy. First of all there was no time travil, time warping...nothing to do with time but wasting it. This was not even a B-movie. Saddly, the acting and FX were not so great ether.(they [stunk]) It looks like they filmed it in an old wearhouse. If you like bombs, or hate your self, then this for you, if not stay away...far away. Run if you have to.

THE WORST MOVIE EVER!!!!!
This movie is terrible!!! If it were possible, I would give this movie no stars at all. It's an extremely low-budget sci-fi movie. The thin plot is about a prison in space that gets taken over by its prisoners. One of the prisoners who accidentally ended up in the wrong prison, and the only remaining security guard, team up in order to escape. Everything about this movie is bad. The acting, direction, action, plot, and everything else I can possibly think of is just plain horrible. I taped this off of television for free, and I still felt [....] There is no reason to see this film at all. I truly think it is the worst movie that was ever made.

Cheesy but fun!
First let me say that I wish they'd allow us to rate half-star intervals here; I'd have given this another half-star, mostly due to the great lines given to Arye Gross. I never heard of the guy before, but he's hilarious here in the role of unlikely hero (that also doesn't want to be hero). Reminds me just a little of the Ash character in "Army of Darkness" or the Jack Burton character in "Big Trouble in Little China". It's Arye Gross' performance that raises this film above mediocrity. Without his character, the movie would be a plain-jane sci-fi movie with nothing special about it.... ....Except Maryam D'Abo, whose sexiness could almost carry the whole thing by itself. Mind you, the character she plays isn't a particularly sexy character, but her subtle beauty shows through anyway, and between her and Gross, there is always something worth watching going on. The supporting cast, Jeff Speakman, etc., perform quite well also, and the bad guys are convincingly evil-looking. The production standards are strictly B-movie however. Special effects are okay but not great, and the settings are sort of cliched. There are several close-up shots of an asteroid that is pretty obviously a miniature, but it adds a little charm to it that way--kind of like watching an old sci-fi movie from the 50's. But understand that I don't think this movie is trying to be anything but a B-movie. All in all a standard sci-fi movie with great humor sprinkled throughout. I laughed out loud many times while watching it. It's worth spending money on, but just don't expect Oscar-winning stuff here. And now I have to go see what other movies Arye Gross has been in. Mark Lahren (goopah@btigate.com) ... Read more

Reviews (6)

Pure Fun in a Vampire Flick
This was a made for television movie featuring Ben Cross, who starred as Barnabas Collins in the Dark Shadows revival series as well as having an impressive career in other roles. Nightlife is a comedy . . . much like the Mel Brooks film "Dracula, Dead and Loving It". The plot moves along like it's supposed to be serious but there is an endless array of ridiculous situations that makes it clear it's pure comedy. The premise is Vlad's love Angelique has been awakened by gravediggers who opened her coffin hoping to find treasure. Vlad wants her back but Angelique is interested in the doctor who is trying to figure out what her "rare blood disorder" is and clearly hates Vlad. The ensuing struggle between Vlad and his inept sidekicks against the doctor and his friends becomes a classic "science versus mythology" fight to the bitter end. If you like vampire comedies this one has all the ingredients you're looking for.

NIGHTLIFE IS FULL OF LIFE
I found this movie thoroughly enjoyable! How marvelous to have a movie filled with likeable, quirky characters -- villians, victims and heroes alike! The story and script effectively intertwined drama and witty humor without resorting to the triteness of "camp". I was a big fan of Ben Cross in the short-lived remake of the Dark Shadows series and found him absolutely delightful in Nightlife. I was also a fan of the Equalizer series, always eagerly anticipating the episodes with the mysterious, weapons specialist/procurer, Mickey -- played by Keith Szarabajka, who handsomely plays Dr. David Zuckerman, the heroic, love-smitten doctor in Nightlife. Maryam d'Abo as the reawakened vampire, Angelique, is sexy as all get out without coming off as "vampish"; and Camille Saviola as Rosa Mercedes, Angelique's housekeeper and loyal protector, is side-stitchingly hysterical (and loveable)! The music is catchy, and as quirky as the movie. Nightlife provides 1 hour 33 minutes of intelligent, light-hearted fun, something that isn't always so easy to find these days. I highly recommend it!!

I absolutely Love this movie!
If you like funny horror movies(like I do),this is a good one for you.O.K.,it can be a bit corny at times,but that's part of it's charm.The other part comes from the performances,especially that of Keith Szarabajka (I hope I spelled that right).He's perfect as the hematologist who thinks his vampire patient is just suffering from anemia.Everyone seems to be having a great time,and so will you!

"The happiest vampire south-of-the-border"
Come on! This one's not so bad! In fact, it's quite good! Far superior than most Hollywood horror turkeys -like 'An American Werewolf in Paris' or 'John Carpenter's Vampires', to name a few- with bigger budgets and state-of-the-art special effects. Let's just say that what it lacks in production values, excels in talent (except for the "Mexican maid") and script. In fact, it's one of the funniest TV movies I've seen!

Yet, I must confess I'm fond of this flick for personal reasons too. One is Maryam D'Abo, my favorite screen siren and perhaps the most underrated of them all, who happens to be a damn good actress if given the right role. Here she stars as a vampire in distress and, though the part is no Blanche Dubois for sure, she plays it with charm, sexiness and gusto.

The other is the fact that this movie was shot not only in my hometown, Mexico City, but in my very own neighborhood (Coyoacán), and it's funny to see buildings, streets and places you've known all your life as sets for a horror film. Too bad I was in London at the time, for I would've loved to meet Ms. D'Abo and ask her for an autograph; perhaps even invite her an ice cream across the street!

'The happiest vampire south of the border!'
This one's not so bad! As a matter of fact, it's quite good! Far better (and funnier too!) than, say, 'An American Werewolf in Paris', which was done with a much bigger budget and a state-of-the-art Hollywood production. Come to think of it, as far as made-for-TV movies go, this one has an above average script, great performances (although I think the "feisty" Mexican maid overdoes it badly) and no pretentions whatsoever, which makes it the more enjoyable!

I must confess I like this movie for personal reasons: One is Maryam D'Abo, the silver screen's most underrated siren and a damn good actress if given a worthy role. Here she plays a vampiress in distress and, though the part is no Blanche Dubois for sure, she does it with gusto and fun!

Two, the movie was filmed in my hometown, more precisely in my neighborhood (Coyoacán), and it's funny to see familiar buildings you've known all your life, some of them just around the corner, as sets for a macabre story. Thank my unlucky stars, I was away in London while the movie was being shot. ¡Chín! I would have loved to meet Ms. D'Abo and asked her for an autograph, maybe even invited her an ice cream across the street! ... Read more

Reviews (1)

A caricature of suspense
Midway through, "Double Obsession" begins to reek of "Misery," when Heather cripples one of her objects of adoration, holds her hostage, and then commits assorted nasties against assorted interlopers. But there's no comparing the sad "Double Obsession" with the masterful "Misery." There are no characters here, only caricatures -- everyone is either psycho or insists on hanging out with psychos, but we have no idea why. Even "Misery"'s truly psychotic Annie Wilkes was more believable. (And more sympathetic.) The soundtrack, by turns, steals suspense and turns suspense into goofiness. And Heather's "psycho laugh" is from Hitchcock by way of Bugs Bunny. If this weren't a feature-length film with professional sets and actors, I'd think it came from a high-school film class.

I really hate writing this, 'cause I know Beth Fisher (Sherry). I'm sure it was the director's fault, Beth. 8o) Write me and I'll apologize to you directly! ... Read more

Reviews (28)

The name's Dalton, Timothy Dalton.
Connery had six films to introduce us to Bond. Lazenby only had one film to strut his stuff as Bond. Then Broccoli turned Bond over to the stand-up comedian, Roger Moore(who I don't think is even British or an actor). He almost got Bond ruined, as the amateur playboy and comic. Then Broccoli woke up and gave Bond to a real experienced actor, the last one being Connery. And Dalton rescues the series from doom. He is moody, suave, deboniaire, witty. Exactly how Fleming envisioned the super-spy. The plot is as exciting as Dalton. A KGB defector(?) informs the MI6 about Smert Spionam, or SMERSH. It is an assassination operation and 002 was its first quarry. 007 is assigned to assassinate Leonid Pushkin, the supposed master-mind of the plot. He also falls in love with a Soviet assassin, Kara Milovy. We later learn that Koskov has been playing us for fools the entire time and Pushkin is really a good guy. The scene where Bond confronts Pushkin is the best in the series. This entire ploy is a cover for a diamonds-for-narcotics smuggling plot and arms deal. The only flaw is a weak villain, but you can't have everything. The score is the best from Barry. The gadgets are far-out. The locales are exotic and beautiful, from Bratislavia to Tangier to Gibraltar to Afghanistan. The action; the safehouse sequence, the pre-title sequence, a fight in a transport plane, and the final confrontation; are all thrilling. Necros is a good memorable assassin. The cast is convincing. I enjoy Gogol's return in this one.

The Living Daylights: It's everything a Bond film should be!
I thought this was a great film! It had an excellent plot, and fabulous stuntwork. I also think that Timothy Dalton did an outstanding job of portraying James Bond. In fact, I understand that when Dalton recieved the part of 007, he reffered back to the original Ian Flemming novels so that he could bring the TRUE attitude of James Bond to the screen.(The way Flemming saw Bond!) Dalton's approach as Bond was dead serious. Which I liked a lot. And the overall film also had a serious plot,(not found since the days of Sean Connery)It really broke away from the slapstick humor found in the Roger Moore films. This was a good comeback. I loved this film, and I consider it to posses the same quality of characters and intense plot of a classic Sean Connery 007 film!

James Bond 101
Aside from some"crowd-pleasing"scenes(the icy car chase and the ensuing cello slide)this is Ian Fleming's 007 of the novels and the early films.Gone are the Roger Moore wisecracks and fantasies,but a straight to the core spy story.Timothy Dalton is a terrific 007 and I ranked him 2nd to Sean Connery.He is icy-cold and he means business.He even looks the Bond of the novels.Dark and a dangerous.An air of menace.But the somewhat disapointment is the action sequences which lacks the punch of the best of the series.Not 007 solid enough.The pre-credit scene is pure Bond thou and Dalton's introduction is likened to that of Connery's in"Dr.No".At that time,Dalton is not yet a familiar face and the film toyed with audience by showing different characters that can be,one assumed;is the new Bond.He is the more human 007,showing frustration and tension that one thought Bond is not capable of.Good supporting players,thou a somewhat tired John Barry score(his last in the series so far)and a intricate plot makes"The Living Daylights"one of my all time fave Bond film.

ONE OF THE BEST BOND FILMS EVER.
A LOT OF PEOPLE DON'T GIVE TIMOTHY DALTON CREDIT FOR HIS ROLE AS JAMES BOND BECAUSE THEY ONLY ATTRIBUTE HIM TO LICENCE TO KILL, BUT THEY ARE DEAD WRONG, BECAUSE THE LIVING DAYLIGHTS IS THE BEST BOND FILM OF THE 80'S. THIS ONE HAS IT ALL, GREAT SCENERY, GREAT CHARACTERS, GREAT BABES, AND GREAT GADGETS. THIS ONE IS SURELY A MUST SEE AND I ASSURE YOU THAT YOU WILL NOT WASTE YOUR VALUABLE TIME OR MONEY. BUY IT!!!

Another 007 Dissappointment
James Bond may be the worst series of movies ever produced. My brother bought this movie while I was logged in. The producers of these so called films have cranked out around 20 of these 2 hour pieces of crap. I suggest to annyone who has not been pleased with other 007 movies will not enjoy this one either. The plots are the same the only diferance between them is the scenery and actors. ... Read more

Reviews (1)

An adorable look at L.O.V.E., S.E.X. and E.S.P.
Mark Frankel does a superb turn as the charming Daniel Becker, a body language expert who is finds himself at a loss when Katie Burrill (Amanda Pays) knows his every thought (literally). Katie is tired of men and their thoughts - "Men's minds are sewers!" she says, but a persistant Daniel doesn't let up and insists they can work things out.

It hard to believe Mark is gone, but thank goodness his memory lives on in his films and television work.

I thought Solitaire for 2 was hilarious and funny, with two wonderful actors and a fantastic story.

A romantic comedy, Solitaire for 2 is a funny, adorable film and worth a video rental! END ... Read more

Reviews (2)

The true art of shootfighting.
I am sure that 9 out of 10 reviews you will find about this movie will define it as CRAPPY, TERRIBLY BAD or even worse, but to me it is quite a great product.
While the editing sucks, that I admit, the action will make you breathlees; the fights are perfectly coreographed, and the blood factor will leave blood-thirsty people more than happy.
Here's the story:
Shingo, a great Shootfighter, has reached the finals of the tournament after beating his opponent quite easely. The other semifinal match will confront Mr. Lee and Shingo's buddy.
Despite threwing a few punches, Shingo's friend finds himself in front of a very powerful fighter, who, after punching him as if he was a PC that has just broken down, rips the poor guy's throat. Mr. Lee is then banned from Shootfighting, and decides to star his own Shootfighting bussiness in Mexico.
Ruben and Nick, Shingo's karate students,and two great fighters, are tracked by Mr. Lee who, decided to take revenge from Shingo, convinces them of participating in Shootfighting, and of course the excitement for no-ruled fighting, and the need of money (typical!) will make them sign up in a tournament where defeat means DEATH.

Extreme!!!
Enter the most merciless combat arena ever imagined, as international martial arts wizard BOLO YEUNG stars with WILLIAM ZABKA, MARTIN KOVE, EDWARD ALBERT JR., and MARYAM D'ABO in this bone-crushing, full contact action spectacular! Karate Champions Ruben and Nick are lured by the menacing Mr. Lee across the border to compete as "shootfighters," a forbidden sport so brutal it's banned from the civilized world. But when Ruben and Nick are forced to face each other in the ring, they realize they're only pawns in Lee's deadly masterplan: a final, fight to the death grudge match between Lee and the legendary founding father and unconquered king of shootfighting - Shingo. ... Read more

Description

DOCTOR ZHIVAGO
A man torn between two women amid the chaos and brutality of the Russian Revolution
One of the world’s most famous love stories and half a century of Russian history come to life in this adaptation of Pasternak’s masterpiece by celebrated screenwriter Andrew Davies (Bridget Jones’s Diary, Pride and Prejudice). War and revolution bring poet and physician Yury Zhivago (Hans Matheson) together with the beautiful Lara (Keira Knightley), his muse and all-consuming passion. But both are haunted — Yury by guilt over his betrayal of Tonya, his beloved wife, and Lara by fear of Komarovsky (Sam Neill), the powerful man who means to have her any way he can.

DVD SPECIAL FEATURES INCLUDE 70 minutes of cast and crew interviews • photo gallery • filmographies • Boris Pasternak biography • English subtitlesMBR> Complete UK broadcast edition
RECOMMENDED FOR MATURE AUDIENCES ... Read more

Reviews (20)

Well worth Owning
Very impressive remake. Bravo Mr. Campiotti and production crew! I was more than skeptical about his new version of Doctor Zhivago, a remake of David Lean's Classic? But then why not! And thank goodness! Hans Matheson and Keira Knightly add new demensions to the characters of Zhivago and Lara. I liked Lara much better this time around than in Lean's film and have a much better understanding of her motivation, who she is, and why Zhivago would venture into a love affair with her. Poor Tonya! In many ways I prefer this small screen version to Lean's great epic. My only complaint...and not much of that...is the score's musical cues...which remind this is a tv production. I had to keep reminding myself this version was written and shot for the tv screen as opposed to a theater. But there are some lovely musical themes. The interviews in special features with the director, writer, producer, and actors is well worth viewing. I am going to make a concentrated effort as result to read the book. What is extraodinary about this story is Zhivago's ability to find beauty in life, and love, in a particualry ugly time in history,a time of great suffering. To have awareness you are alive in your own liftetime, that life is both remarkable and wonderful! Zhivago's sensitivity comes across but was always aloof in David Lean's version. Sam Neill is a great Kamarvosky. What a delicious role! The sex scenes are filmed with taste and are in no way sensationalized. I give this version 5 stars. It was a difficult task bringing this concept to reality having Lean's version hanging over the production.

A Remarkable Remake
This exceptional remake of Doctor Zhiavgo was filmed for the BBC (British television) and presented in the US on PBS KCET channel 28's "Exxonmobil Masterpiece Theatre". This is a very well done adaptation of the original. I was quite impressed, thinking that a classic masterpiece like David Lean's 1965 version starring Julie Christie and Omar Shariff could not be matched. I think this film is worth watching and is a worthy re-make. Although the 1965 version will always be superior, this is not a disposible film. Keira Knightley (British actress from such films as Pirates Of The Caribbean and most recently the romantic comedy Love Actually) stars as the elusive and elegant Lara, Doctor Zhivago's love interest. Keira Knightley's pale looks and vulnerable but passionate nature is true to Lara's character but I much prefer the healthier-looking and more vibrant Julie Christie in the role of Lara. Julie Christie is Lara and will always be. Keira is only second best. The same applies for Hans Matheson, who is directly under the great shadow of Omar Shariff's superior performance. Zhivago is played by the very young and handsome Hans Matheson, Sam Neill portrays the wicked Komarovsky. Following Boris Pasternak's novel set against the Russian Revolution of 1918, the lives of Doctor Zhivago, Lara and Tonya are forever changed. In Imperial Russia, the decadent wealthy are oppressing the poor. Such powerful people as Komarovsky engage in numerous love affairs with poor and needy young women (like Lara). Sam Neil is exceptionally corrupt in this version. He was the lawyer responsible for Zhivago's father's death and completely obcesses over claiming Lara only for himself. He is abusive to her, he rapes her and is completely controlling. Hans Matheson's Zhivago is fresh and a stray from Omar Shariff's performance. Omar Shariff was Middle Eastern and much older and it's quite refreshing to see a youthful and passionate Hans Matheson in the role of the idealistic poet doctor.

The film focuses mostly on the internal and external conflict. Externally, the world of Imperial Russia is falling apart. The Revolution has turned things around and Communism has dominated the Soviet Union after a bloody and terrifying war. The battle scenes are along the lines of "Saving Private Ryan", with that much violence, shock and graphic reality. Man's inhumanity to man is clearly presented. In addition, the film features some real silent film footage from the actual Russian Revolution at the turn of the century. The internal conflict is that of a love triangle- Doctor Zhivago is torn between two women he deeply loves, his wife and childhood sweetheart Tonya with whom he has a son Sasha and his mistress the passionate Lara. At the same time, we are able to get more of Tonya's feelings than we did in the 1965 version (Geraldine Chaplin played Tonya in that version and we did'nt get as much character for her as we do in this version). Tonya is betrayed and hurt. Zhivago is guilty he has committed adultery and cheated on his wife. Lara, on the other hand, although she is evidentially in love with Zhivago, feels obligated to fulfill her own duty to her own adolescent sweetheart whom she has married and had a son with. These marital, societal, public personas come into real conflict in the light of their private, extramarital affairs.

This is a well done two part "miniseries" and highly recommendable if you've read Boris Pasternak's epic and poetic novel as well as if you have seen the original 1965 David Lean version. The only disappointment of this production is the music. Although there are some portions of music that are pleasing - like authentic Russian balalaika instruments and folk music during Zhivago and Tonya's wedding and in the Moscow ballrooms where Komarovsky seduces Lara, the rest of the music is too generic, subtle and lacking the vitality of drama and the gorgeous romanticism of the original score by Maurice Jarre in 1965. Of course, I'm upset they did'nt even remake "Lara's Theme" the definitive romantic love theme of cinematic history right along with the Tara Theme in Gone With The Wind. They could have at least composed music that sounds more like Maurice Jarre's original or they could have contracted the now elderly Jarre to re-write music for this new adaptation. Kudos nonetheless for a supremely engrossing film that should win Best TV miniseries in the next Emmys. If not, British television ought to reward the makers of this film, as well as Hans Matheson and Keira Knightley for well- delivered performances.

Completelly true romance
I recorded Dr. Zivago when it came out on KCET...and this movie is completely romantic for the people who truely look at the hearth of love... I really recomand this movie for the people who believe that their is always a chance in life to be together with your true love... even if society and time separate you...

Beautiful.
I never thought they could re-make one of the most wonderful love stories of all time and have it be credible, but it was done--I was blown away. I intended just to watch the first hour on TV but ended up staying for all four! Incredibly moving, and i am so glad its on DVD.

Is something wrong with my TV?
I would be only too happy to give this adaptation 4 stars, maybe even 4 1/2, but there seems to be a slight problem. My dvd displays the film in an anamorphic shape, making it vital for me to have a widescreen TV. The image is stretched so everyone is tall and skinny. Hard to watch for long.

Okay, now that that rant is out of the way I will say this: The David Lean version of Zhivago is my favorite movie. As a filmmaker I enjoy it for it's richness. The morality of the story leaves much to be desired, but can be explained by the desperate times that it takes place. I watched this version with certain expectations which were both too high and too low. Despite that I still enjoyed it very much. The cast was solid and the production value high. I even enjoyed the music though it was SO different from Maurice Jarre's brilliant score. That was actually a good point.

If you have to make a choice (and you don't right now) between the two films I recommend the first, but the new one is an admirable effort... that sounds demeaning. It's quite good. And Keira is beautiful.

Now what's with that anamorphic image?! ... Read more

Reviews (1)

"Fatal Attraction" without the budget
Nothing new here; you've seen this movie hundreds of times, only with different actors, different settings (this one's filmed in Vancouver) and under different titles. Jay Underwood is the creepy stalker prying into poor Maryam D'Abo's life as a single mother and desperate restauranteur. You can guess the entire plot just watching its first minute, although, should I ever meet Ms. D'Abo, I'd probably be doing the same thing, so who am I to cast a stone? ... Read more

Reviews (1)

The movie was the Immortal Sin
I purchased Immortal Sins after an Amazon search for all films featuring Shari Shattuck. The list was short, but I find her to be exotically attractive and inclined to play seductive roles. Whether she is or is not wearing clothes, this typecasting is perfect.

Unfortunately, this film did not even approach the 2 ½ star rating which probably marked the zenith of Shari's film career (On Deadly Ground with Steven Segal). The plot was probably written by a six-year old with a crayon, and could have been edited into a film of about 10 minutes in length without losing anything. Further, the film was shot in what I unimaginatively refer to as dark-o-vision. If there was anything of interest to see it was probably so dark in the film you wouldn't have or couldn't have seen it anyway. Regardless of whether you are a Maryam d'Abo, Cliff De Young or Shari Shattuck fan, save your money. ... Read more

Reviews (2)

The true art of shootfighting.
I am sure that 9 out of 10 reviews you will find about this movie will define it as CRAPPY, TERRIBLY BAD or even worse, but to me it is quite a great product.
While the editing sucks, that I admit, the action will make you breathlees; the fights are perfectly coreographed, and the blood factor will leave blood-thirsty people more than happy.
Here's the story:
Shingo, a great Shootfighter, has reached the finals of the tournament after beating his opponent quite easely. The other semifinal match will confront Mr. Lee and Shingo's buddy.
Despite threwing a few punches, Shingo's friend finds himself in front of a very powerful fighter, who, after punching him as if he was a PC that has just broken down, rips the poor guy's throat. Mr. Lee is then banned from Shootfighting, and decides to star his own Shootfighting bussiness in Mexico.
Ruben and Nick, Shingo's karate students,and two great fighters, are tracked by Mr. Lee who, decided to take revenge from Shingo, convinces them of participating in Shootfighting, and of course the excitement for no-ruled fighting, and the need of money (typical!) will make them sign up in a tournament where defeat means DEATH.

Extreme!!!
Enter the most merciless combat arena ever imagined, as international martial arts wizard BOLO YEUNG stars with WILLIAM ZABKA, MARTIN KOVE, EDWARD ALBERT JR., and MARYAM D'ABO in this bone-crushing, full contact action spectacular! Karate Champions Ruben and Nick are lured by the menacing Mr. Lee across the border to compete as "shootfighters," a forbidden sport so brutal it's banned from the civilized world. But when Ruben and Nick are forced to face each other in the ring, they realize they're only pawns in Lee's deadly masterplan: a final, fight to the death grudge match between Lee and the legendary founding father and unconquered king of shootfighting - Shingo. ... Read more

Reviews (10)

A Sliver of Hope Shines Among the Ashes of Despair
This movie deserves a just review, if only to debunk the notion that the film bears any resemblance to the 'The Dead Poets Society.' It is a uniquely English work that illustrates what it is to keep a stiff upper lip -- after a fair amount of quivering.

Albert Finney is masterful as Andrew Crocker-Harris, the stern and unyielding teacher of classics who has, rather suddenly, found himself at the end of his career. With modernity regnant in society, Crocker-Harris faces students uninterested in the great literary works of antiquity and a successor who intends to abolish the tenets of a curriculum that once produced the most learned citizens of any nation. Crocker-Harris can clearly see that his time is passing. But unlike 'Dead Poets,' which sends the unacceptable message that suicide offers an exit from seemingly intractable problems, 'The Browning Version' finds its main character clinging to hope in the face of despair. The vehicle by which this occurs is a student's kind gesture.

There are several excellent moments in this film, but perhaps the finest was a scene in which Crocker-Harris -- teaching his final class in the Classics -- attempts to convey depth and feeling in translating Aeshylus' Agamemnon. It's hard not to get caught up in it. For the first time, the staid old teacher conjures up meaning from across the ages in a work that, for the students, is only a dusty tome better kept on a library shelf.

My chief complaint about this film centers on development: it needed more character development and a more studied consideration of the literary content, to which only allusions are given.

As the French would say, 'The Browning Version' is a voir-absolument.